The distinction between a sphere of private life and a sphere of public life corresponds to the existence of the spheres of family and politics as different and separate entities.
<h3>Give 3 examples of responsible activities that you do as an ordinary citizen.</h3>
- ride the bus
- go to a square
- go to the supermarket
<h3>3 examples of responsible activities you do in your civic life.</h3>
- by marriage
- for the exercise of effective public employment
- for placement in a higher education course
<h3>What are the differences between the responsibilities of civil life and the duties of civil life? Give two specific examples for each.</h3>
Civilians have the responsibility to maintain and propagate order, while duties are the obligations imposed by law on civilians.
With this information, we can conclude that the distinction between a sphere of private life and a sphere of public life corresponds to the existence of the spheres of family and politics as different and separate entities.
Learn more about civil rights in brainly.com/question/1142564
#SPJ1
Barbarians destroyed a lot of the documentation in 390BC, Historians now are left to piece the puzzle and grasp an understanding based on the evidence left
The case you describe is: SWEATT v. PAINTER
Details:
The case of <em>Sweatt v. Painter (</em>1950), challenged the "separate but equal" doctrine regarding racial segregated schooling which had been asserted by an earlier case, <em>Plessy v. Ferguson</em> (1896).
Heman Marion Sweatt was a black man who was not allowed admission into the School of Law of the University of Texas. Theophilus Painter was the president of the University of Texas at the time. So that's where the names in the lawsuit came from.
In the case, which made its way to the US Supreme Court, the ultimate decision was that forcing Mr. Sweatt to attend law school elsewhere or in a segregated program at the University of Texas failed to meet the "separate but equal" standard, because other options such as those would have lesser facilities, and he would be excluded from interaction with future lawyers who were attending the state university's main law school, available only to white students. The school experience would need to be truly equal in order for the "separate but equal" policy to be valid.
In 1954, another Supreme Court decision went even further. <em>Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka </em>extended civil liberties to all Americans in regard to access to all levels of education. The <em>Plessy v. Ferguson </em>case had said that separate, segregated public facilities were acceptable as long as the facilities offered were equal in quality. In <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em>, segregation was shown to create inequality, and the Supreme Court unanimously ruled segregation to be unconstitutional. After the Brown v. Board of Education decision, there was a struggle to get states to implement the new policy of desegregated schools, but eventually they were compelled to do so.
Answer:
i dont know this, but i believe is B or C, sorry if you get it wrong
Explanation:
Yes it is because most things can stay balanced
