Answer:
D He is happy to receive help?
Explanation:
Answer:
Earl <em><u>sought</u></em> shelter after lightning <em><u>struck</u></em> the ground just a few feet away.
Explanation:
If we consider the given sentence carefully, we can see or understand that the sentence talks about an event that is in the past. So, the verbs in the sentence will also be in the past forms.
The verbs in the sentence are "seek" and "strike". And the past tense and past participle forms of these two are "seek"- sought and "strike" is struck.
So, considering the sentence is in the past tense, the correct spelling and form of the past tense of the verbs will be "sought" and "struck".
Thus, the correct sentence will be-
Earl <em><u>sought</u></em> shelter after lightning <em><u>struck</u></em> the ground just a few feet away.
I believe the answer you're looking for is called : free verse
Answer:
The appropriate approach is "Zeus : mythology".
Explanation:
The line of reasoning has always been about the personality as well as the subject matter under which it's recognized.
- Furthermore, the soundtrack would be something he did, with perhaps the exception of someone throughout the argument, including the multiple personalities discussed earlier.
- Zeus, on another hand, would be indeed not real and is therefore strongly correlated with legends in almost the similar way that a fair number is affiliated mostly with melodrama.
He wanted to convey that indifference is worse than hate or anger. One could be angry at injustice or hate evil, violent acts Indifference is the absence of compassion and implies something worse than outright hate; indifference implies a lack of acknowledgment. Being indifferent to another's suffering is like saying, 'you're suffering is not even worth my consideration.' Wiesel speaks from his experience of the Holocaust, but this could be applied to any situation in history in which the world was indifferent; in which the world willfully refused to acknowledge suffering of others for any number of unjustifiable reasons: 1) out of sight, out of mind, 2) passivity, laziness, 3) an untried feeling of hopelessness ('what could i possibly do?'), 4) selfishness. When Wiesel speaks of indifference he also means ignorance in 3 senses: 1) ignorant as in lacking sensitivity, 2) lacking knowledge and 3) ignoring. The 'perils of indifference' could be described as the 'the terrible outcomes of ignoring atrocities. Apply this to anything today, where suffering is ignored by indifferent people and governments. (i.e., Darfur, Haiti). The peril of indifference would be to allow (allow by ignoring = indifference) an atrocity like the Holocaust to occur again.
