1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stepan [7]
3 years ago
11

2. [4 marks] Question 15.40. It is said that the New York City mobster Casper Holstein

Business
1 answer:
jonny [76]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Explanation:

mark me brainliest!

You might be interested in
Lesley Torres is a project manager for the campaign​ "Action against Deforestation in​ Indonesia." She recently faced a glitch w
andrew11 [14]

Answer: (A) Controlling

Explanation:

According to the given question, Lesley Torres is the project manager in an organization and she organized a campaign against the deforestation in the Indonesia.

She performing the controlling function by managing all the schedules and also implementing the given process.

The controlling is one of the main function in the management as it ensure all the activities performed accurately and also helps in planning all the activities in an organization. It basically helps in meet the desirable goals of the company by setting a standard performance.

 Therefore, Option (A) is correct answer.

 

8 0
3 years ago
Company A has a beta of 0.70, while Company B's beta is 1.45. The required return on the stock market is 11.00%, and the risk-fr
stira [4]

Answer:

company B's cost of equity is 14.0375% - 8.975% = 5.0625% higher than company A's cost of equity

Explanation:

cost of equity = risk free rate + (beta x market premium)

risk free rate = 4.25%

market premium = market return - risk free rate = 11% - 4.25% = 6.75%

Company A's cost of equity = 4.25% + (0.7 x 6.75%) = 8.975%

Company B's cost of equity = 4.25% x (1.45 x 6.75%) = 14.0375%

this means that company B's cost of equity is 14.0375% - 8.975% = 5.0625% higher than company A's cost of equity.

8 0
3 years ago
Suppose that the S&P 500, with a beta of 1.0, has an expected return of 13% and T-bills provide a risk-free return of 4%. a.
Aleksandr [31]

Answer:

a. The answers are as follows:

(i) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 4%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0

(ii) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 6.25%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.25

(iii) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 8.50%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.50

(iv) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 10.75%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.75

(v) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 13%; and Beta of Portfolio = 1.0

b. Change in expected return = 9% increase

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete as part b of it is omitted. The complete question is therefore provided before answering the question as follows:

Suppose that the S&P 500, with a beta of 1.0, has an expected return of 13% and T-bills provide a risk-free return of 4%.

a. What would be the expected return and beta of portfolios constructed from these two assets with weights in the S&P 500 of (i) 0; (ii) 0.25; (iii) 0.50; (iv) 0.75; (v) 1.0

b. How does expected return vary with beta? (Do not round intermediate calculations.)

The explanation to the answers are now provided as follows:

a. What would be the expected return and beta of portfolios constructed from these two assets with weights in the S&P 500 of (i) 0; (ii) 0.25; (iii) 0.50; (iv) 0.75; (v) 1.0

To calculate these, we use the following formula:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (WS&P * RS&P) + (WT * RT) ………… (1)

Beta of Portfolio = (WS&P * BS&P) + (WT * BT) ………………..………………. (2)

Where;

WS&P = Weight of S&P = (1) – (1v)

RS&P = Return of S&P = 13%, or 0.13

WT = Weight of T-bills = 1 – WS&P

RT = Return of T-bills = 4%, or 0.04

BS&P = 1.0

BT = 0

After substituting the values into equation (1) & (2), we therefore have:

(i) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0 (i.e. WS&P = 0)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0) * 0.04) = 0.04, or 4%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0) * 0) = 0

(ii) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.25 (i.e. WS&P = 0.25)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.25 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.25) * 0.04) = 0.0625, or 6.25%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.25 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.25) * 0) = 0.25

(iii) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.50 (i.e. WS&P = 0.50)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.50 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.50) * 0.04) = 0.0850, or 8.50%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.50 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.50) * 0) = 0.50

(iv) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.75 (i.e. WS&P = 0.75)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.75 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.75) * 0.04) = 0.1075, or 10.75%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.75 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.75) * 0) = 0.75

(v) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 1.0 (i.e. WS&P = 1.0)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (1.0 * 0.13) + ((1 – 1.0) * 0.04) = 0.13, or 13%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (1.0 * 1.0) + (1 – 1.0) * 0) = 1.0

b. How does expected return vary with beta? (Do not round intermediate calculations.)

There expected return will increase by the percentage of the difference between Expected Return and Risk free rate. That is;

Change in expected return = Expected Return - Risk free rate = 13% - 4% = 9% increase

4 0
3 years ago
Rupert and cordelia own an american company that does business in foreign nations. getting a license in a new country can be cha
Lyrx [107]

Answer:

The payment made by Cordelia

Explanation:

In the scenario it stated clearly that Rupert filled out what would have been a normal application form for operational license in the country

However Cordelia using connections was able to schedule a meeting with the government official that <u>has the authority to determine which foreign companies get licenses, and pays him $200 to approve their license.</u>

Cordelia payment is nothing short of bribery and corruption because it is not a legally required payment and the motive was clearly to unduly influence the minister to approve their license.

Such payment will likely violate the foreign corrupt practices act

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Use the information below to calculate the number of orders per year when using the EOQ: Annual demand for an item is 43,000 uni
IRINA_888 [86]

Answer:

The closest answer is 49.

Explanation:

Given that,

Annual demand, D = 43,000 units

Ordering cost, O = $200

Per unit cost of the item = $50

Annual holding cost, H =  annual holding rate × Per unit cost of the item

                                      = 35% × $50

                                      = $17.5

EOQ=\sqrt{\frac{2\times D\times O}{H} }

EOQ=\sqrt{\frac{2\times 43,000\times 200}{17.5} }

              = 991.39

              = 992 units

Therefore,

Number of orders per year = Annual demand ÷ EOQ

                                             = 43,000 ÷ 992

                                             = 43.34

Hence, the closest answer is 49 and this is not given in the question.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why do people have piggie banks answer please
    11·2 answers
  • A 20-year loan of 2,500 is repaid with payments at the end of each year. Each of the first ten payments equals 175% of the amoun
    14·1 answer
  • Mervon Company has two operating departments: Mixing and Bottling. Mixing has 350 employees and Bottling has 350 employees. Indi
    11·1 answer
  • How to get a personal loan with bad credit?
    6·1 answer
  • Mediocre economists often consider only the immediate apparent effects of a change, whereas a good economist will also consider
    10·1 answer
  • The head teller of a bank embezzled $50,000 from the bank. Which insuring agreement in a financial institution bond is designed
    9·1 answer
  • Why does supplier competition make it harder for an entrepreneur to be successful
    8·1 answer
  • Bond J has a coupon rate of 5 percent and Bond K has a coupon rate of 11 percent. Both bonds have 14 years to maturity, make sem
    13·1 answer
  • The primary objective of expense recognition is to Promote comparability between financial statements of different periods. Prov
    10·1 answer
  • Identify a type of market failure. Provide an example of that type of market failure and briefly explain one way that the govern
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!