The effects of European colonization on East Africa versus Central and South Africa were such that:
Southern and Central Africa:
- Slavery was done on a larger scale.
- South and Central Africans were treated harshly.
- Europeans exploited resources
East Africa:
- Trade gave them access to new food crops, textiles and metal
- Slave trade was reduced compared to other parts of Africa.
<h3>How did colonization differ in East Africa versus Central and South Africa?</h3>
Colonization in Eastern Africa was not as bad as in the Central and Southern parts as colonization brought trade which brought new crops and metal products. The slave trade was also not as much as other parts of Africa.
Central and Southern Africa on the other hand, faced a lot of slavery from the Portuguese in Angola and the Belgians in the Congo. This led to the impoverishment of Africans while their wealth was exploited heavily and in places like South Africa, this continued well into the 20th century.
Find out more on colonization in Africa at brainly.com/question/12360924.
#SPJ1
Why are y'all asking in different languages
pls ask in english
THE CORRECT ANSWER IS B
<span>B. So the reciter does not forget what he has heard
Muslims recites the Quran so that they do not forget to read it. this is because they believe that if the forget to read the Quran, everybody will forget it, and then it will be altered without their knowledge.
</span>
Constantine was the emperor who <span>created a colossal statue of himself to be placed in a basilica in the center of Rome.
During his era of reign, Constantine did many reforms to strengthen his empire. Reforms were done on the financial, military, social and</span><span> administrative levels. He even introduced a new gold coin as a method of combating the inflation known as "solidus".</span>
