the diffrence bewteen 2 and one it comes and goes like days
Answer:
A. National-security argument
Explanation:
The National-security argument is also known as the National-defense argument. The argument proposes the imposition of high tariffs on locally manufactured goods so that the country would not be dependent on other countries for those goods in the event of war. For example, if a country is dependent on other counties for the production of food, then it would be in great danger in the advent of war. Tires that are also used to prepare weapons should be sourced within a country so that in the advent of war, the country would not be dependent on others.
This is the argument employed by the congresswoman who sought the imposition of a tariff on tires so that the United States would not be dependent on other foreign countries during a war.
Answer:
forced U.S. to become more self-reliant
Explanation:
The 1807 Embargo Act in the short run resulted in very serious negative effects, but in the long run it helped the American economy to be more self-reliant.
Some of the negative effects on the short run include:
-agricultural products' prices and earnings decreased
-shipping-related industries were devastated
-existing markets were wrecked
-unemployment increased
-smuggling was widely endorsed by the public
-prices of domestic shipping increased
-imports and exports decreased
As a very positive effect, specially on the long run, it increased reliance on domestic manufacturing
.
Answer:
The isn't in the constitution against it.
