Answer: B. They directly implement and enforce new laws that establish
policy
Rulers of Indian states did not have autonomy under the British Rule.
Explanation:
The amount of power the ruler had over his dominion were nominal at best and their royalty was subject to the British as they could cite any reason and annex their land from them.
The amount of power the ruler had was also dependent on how closely the British were involved in their territory.
This was to be seen in places like Delhi and Calcutta where the British influence was more than in fringes like Kerala and Orrissa where the King still had more power.
The power of the ruler was subject to the needs and interference of the British.
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/15650754#readmore
This speech was delivered at the height of the Cold War<span> – an appeal for peace at a time when what President Eisenhower had described as the Military-Industrial complex was much more interested in weapons and war than peace. It was also a time when President Kennedy was sending personal representatives to Cuba in order to eventually achieve a rapprochement with Fidel Castro. The CIA was aware of these contacts by tapping the telephones of the representatives – and its leaders and right-wing friends, and above all the anti-Castro Cubans, were fiercely opposed. They were also opposed to Kennedy's plans to withdraw from Viet Nam. It was also a time when Robert F. Kennedy was making it hot for the mafia. JFK was assassinated five months later. [Editor] </span>
