Of all the option given about the dollar diplomacy of United States, the correct answer is “U.S. Dollar Diplomacy in Latin America was often accompanied by military intervention”.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The Dollar Diplomacy of United States was all about foreign policy which aided for the creation of stability promoting the American interest in commerce over the globe through China and West Africa.
But the foreign policy was intervened with military intervention accompanying to the Latin America. The dollar diplomacy failed to create the stability in commercial interest with the failure of aim to abandon the military intervention from the Latin America in due course of revolutionary times.
Answer:
The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.
Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.
For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.
Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.
Because she was no longer a slave, it felt to her as if she was a new person. she felt free.
Answer:
Although Belgium did colonize other parts of the world it wasn't close to the amount of land grabbed by the other 3 empires so I would say Belgium.
Explanation:
