The system of government of the United States, initiated as an experiment in the matter of freedom and democracy in 1776, has given evidence of its admirable resistance and adaptability. Even though the United States is often referred to as a democracy, it is more accurate to define it as a federal constitutional republic. What does that mean? "Constitutional" refers to the fact that the government of this country is based on a Constitution that is the supreme law of the nation. The Constitution not only provides the framework that defines what the structure of the federal government and state governments should be, but also imposes signifi cant limits on the powers of the federal government all of them. "Federal" means that the governments of the 50 states exist alongside the national government. The "republic" is a form of government in which the people hold power, but elect representatives to exercise it.
I believe the answer is: Gaining control of Paris and forcing a change in the monarchy.
The revolutionaries planned to do this by eliminating Charles X , (who succeeded king louis after he was executed by his own people) . Eliminating Charles X from the government marked the end of monarch system in France, and changed it to popular sovereignty. Leaders of france was elected through democratic election after this event.
Answer:
It has survived only because of the phrase “Betwixt and Between.” In our context today, it literally means that some employees are working from home and some are limping back to the office. Another meaning of Betwixt and Between is that people are nervous and wondering what the future holds.
Explanation:
Answer:
B) Judiciary Act of 1789.
Explanation:
John Marshall ruled on this case as the Chief Justice. He first answered that Marbury had a right to his job because it had been signed and approved. The actual delivery was a custom, not a requirement. He then ruled that a writ of mandamus (a type of court order) was the correct way for Marbury to rule. Finally, he noted that the Judiciary Act of 1789 allowed the Supreme Court to make this kind of ruling.
<em>The next question was who could decide this issue. Marshall ruled that the Supreme Court could decide it because the Judiciary Act of 1789 said that they could. However, Marshall said that a section of the Judiciary Act was unconstitutional. That section allowed the Supreme Court to make a writ but the United States Constitution did not. Therefore, that section was unconstitutional and the Supreme Court could not make a writ for Marbury.
</em>
Marshall looking over the Constitution and the statute is judicial review, a statement that the Supreme Court had an independent power to determine whether something was constitutional or not.
