Answer:
it means to protect the interests of native-born people and established inhabitants against immigrants.
The correct answer is "Senate members represent state interests while House members represent district interests."
One of the biggest differences between Senators and members of the House are the people they represent. Remember, there are two Senators per US state, no matter the size of the state. However, the number of representatives in the house for a respective state is based on its population. Larger states like California and New York have more representatives due to larger populations.
Due to the larger populations of these areas, the states are broken down into Congressional districts. These districts allow House members to bring up local matters on a national platform.
<span>A strong economy and proving that the economy was the best.</span>
The cotton gin changed the textile industry by making cotton far easier to sort, greatly increasing the output of available cotton and therefore causing the price to drop. The cotton gin works by separating the cotton fluff that will be made into fabric from seeds and dirt. Previously, picking these seeds out of cotton took a great deal of time and energy, but the invention of the cotton gin in 1794 sped up the process, allowing farms to produce far more cotton and increasing the amount of cotton available for making clothing.
Mapp Vs Ohio issues refer to a judicial case that took place in 1961, in which the Supreme Court ruled 6 to 3 in a case where evidence presented at a trial was illegally obtained and used against the defendant.
Miss Mapp was a woman who refused to admit the intrussion of three Cleveland police officers into her house in persuit to some evidence in connection with a recent bombing issue. Officers did’nt have any warrant signed by a judge when they arrived to her home.
During the case, attorney allegated the protection of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the US (current since 1791 as a part of the Bill of Rights) for the woman. This amendment forbids unreasonable searches and seizures of individuals and property and implies that the use of evidence obtained in violation of the amendment is unconstitutional
