Answer:
Songs went from being performed by one person to many people.
Explanation:
<em>Songs went from being one part to multiple parts</em> – this is not the right answer. This is not what monophonic and polyphonic music means.
<u><em>Songs went from being performed by one person to many peopl</em></u><u>e – this is the right answer.</u> Monophonic songs are sung in one voice and it is only one melody. Polyphonic means there are more voices at the same time or that more melodies are going simultaneously. This Renaissance development to polyphonic changed music a lot compared to the Middle Ages.<u> Many of Renaissance songs were composed as polyphonic compositions for masses sang in Latin in churches.</u>
<em>Songs went from being classical in nature to more electronic </em>– this is not the right answer. This is not the meaning of monophonic and polyphonic, and also there was no electronic music in Renaissance.
<em>There is no difference between monophonic and polyphonic music</em> – this is not the correct answer. There is a difference between monophonic and polyphonic.
<span>A good or service is said to be highly elastic if there is a a slight change in price this will cause a sharp change in the quantity. Usually these kinds of products are readily available in the market - example is jewelry. lottery ticket
</span>
Answer:
(Belonging to nepali culture)Nepali dances are very important for life, culture, and traditions. It is also the good source of entertainment as well as an effective refresher. The movement of feet and body in the rhythm of song or music in a pleasing way is dance. The complement of dance is song and music.
Answer:
C. They placed more emphasis on science.
It is an Ottonian manuscript. It <span>produced magnificent medieval illuminated manuscripts and it is about religion. They were a major art form of the time, and monasteries received direct sponsorship from emperors and bishops, having the best in equipment and talent available. The range of heavily illuminated texts was very largely restricted (unlike in the </span>Carolingian Renaissance) to the main liturgical books, with very few secular works being so treated.
