Option A has the best meanings for the word "Simple" presented in the paragraph, as this word takes on the meaning of "modest" and "straightforward."
We can arrive at this answer because:
- The text was written by a father, who wants to show his son how much the regions he knows have changed over time.
- First, he informs his son that his homeland is no longer as "simple" as it once was.
- In this case, the father claims that the son's birthplace does not represent the cozy, modest and safe place he knew because everything has changed.
- He also uses the word "simple" to show how much Cesar changed Rome, which was once a political, straightforward, and objective place, but lost all those characteristics and became a mess.
In this case, we can say that the word "simple" was used to promote feelings of modesty and formality.
You can see the full text in the figure below.
You can have more information about this at the link:
brainly.com/question/25648511
I have done a little research, and everything I've read says that the whole brain is still growing and maturing, but idk I could b wrong.
Answer:
Negative sentence: There was no one present who did not criticize her conduct
Affirmative sentence: Everyone criticised her conduct.
Explanation:
An affirmative sentence is used to show or prove how true a statement or assertion is, while
A negative sentence is used to show how false a sentence or claim is.
Therefore, the given negative sentence has been written in an affirmative tone.
Appeal to emotion or argumentum ad passiones or appeal to feels is a logical fallacy characterized by the manipulation of the recipient's emotions in order to win an argument, especially in the absence of factual evidence.[1] This kind of appeal to emotion is a type of red herring and encompasses several logical fallacies, including appeal to consequences, appeal to fear, appeal to flattery, appeal to pity, appeal to ridicule, appeal to spite, and wishful thinking.
Instead of facts, persuasive language is used to develop the foundation of an appeal to emotion-based argument. Thus, the validity of the premises that establish such an argument does not prove to be verifiable.[2]
Appeals to emotion are intended to draw visceral feelings from the acquirer of the information. And in turn, the acquirer of the information is intended to be convinced that the statements that were presented in the fallacious argument are true; solely on the basis that the statements may induce emotional stimulation such as fear, pity and joy. Though these emotions may be provoked by an appeal to emotion fallacy, effectively winning the argument, substantial proof of the argument is not offered, and the argument's premises remain invalid.
A a short story is fictional, whole an autobioghy is non fiction
