Answer: theory/concept of natural state.
Explanation: Modern times (in philosophy usually associated with René Descartes, who died in 1650, i.e. times when so-called modern philosophy was initiated) mark the beginning of non-religious explanation of society. It means that social philosophers no more refer to Bible and Biblical mythology as their primary resource. Instead of that they work with the fiction of "natural state". These theories are usually called theories of natural state and within these concept one can find not only concept of human nature (as a part of modern philosophical anthropology) but also so called "natural rights" of men. It is especially Locke and Hobbes that mark that period in this respect, but also bit younger Jean Jacques Rousseau.
I dont understand your question
<span>1. </span>The
correct answer here is D. Japan’s economy was in a great state after the World War
I but as the Great Depression hit so did the Japanese economy plummet. Japan has
a few national resources and relies mainly on import. Because of the Great Depression
the trade with the foreign nations was in ruins which led to the economic crisis.
Because Japan was lacking resources and land space they invaded Manchuria.
<span>2. </span>The
correct answer here is C. Both Italy and Japan believed that they were not
rewarded adequately for their efforts in the war. Both expected more territory
and were left wanting. This can be seen as one of the reasons why these
countries developed later as they did and sided with Germany in the WWII.
<span>4. </span>The
correct answer here is A. Unfortunately, the League of Nations was not very strong.
They had no army and the both Italy and Germany largely ignored their decrees.
The League of Nations reacted the only way it could and that was by imposing sanctions
and enforcing trade embargoes on these states.
He believed that they were soldiers of democracy because they fought in a war to protect a world that disenfranchised them and segregated them and ended the reconstruction and what not. He believed that the country was being heavily racist towards African-Americans and yet the soldiers still put their values above this and fought to protect a democracy that didn't protect them.