Answer:
C.
Explanation:
The answer is C because the excerpt states, "For Hercules, victor of sovereign power, His labours sing his praise and lasting fame." this portrays him in a sort of heroic light as it calls him a "victor." It also states how people sang in praise of him. It gives the idea that he is admired by many. Furthermore, the exceprtr states how he completed many difficult deeds, which gives reason for why they may look up to him.
Answer:
It is very interesting. Cool, and cooler than you think. In this movie, things become very hopeless. But... In this movie, we see that some people are problem solvers. So we see this is a great movie!
Explanation:
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
I have trouble believing Mr. Sawicki's characterization of Steve, because he knows Steve only in school. Since Mr. Sawicki does not know Steve outside of school, he cannot make a judgment about what Steve has been doing in his neighborhood or who his friends are. Sawicki says Steve is honest, but even if Steve is good or honest in Mr. Sawicki's opinion, good people can still make mistakes.
What did you consider when you were writing your answer? Check all that apply.
what Mr. Sawicki says
. what other people say
. whether Steve is guilty or innocent
. what Steve has said
Answer:
what Mr. Sawicki says
Explanation:
The answer shown in the text above was created considering only what Mr. Sawicki says about Steve. The answer states that Steve's characterization through what Mr. Sawicki says is not reliable. That's because Mr. Sawicki doesn't know Steve fully and only knows his behavior in one place, at school. Mr. Sawicki does not know anything about Steve and does not even know how he behaves outside of school, so he cannot say that Steve is honest. In other words, Mr. Sawicki's speech is imprecise, it lacks evidence and therefore cannot be trusted.
I believe this argument is inductive reasoning due to not using facts that support your sentence hope this helps :)
Answer:
D
Explanation:
With the appearance of the wolves at the end of the story, the author left an open ending but suggests the end of the conflict between the two men, too. They wanted to kill each other and the wish becoming reality in a twisted way because the wolfs will kill them, as the author concludes with the happiness of Ulrich because of his hate to Georg and desire to saw him dead, even if the wolves murder him too.