The assertion that sums up both sides of the ethanol debate are that people in favor of ethanol believe it will reduce prices at the pump and people against ethanol are interested in exploring other fuel sources, as shown in option D.
We can arrive at this answer because:
The text shows how ethanol was launched on the market as a type of fuel that would promote economic and environmental protection.
However, the manufacture of ethanol using corn completely changed this perspective.
Ethanol ended up causing an increase in the prices of fuel and products that need corn directly or indirectly.
Taxes have also been raised to promote ethanol production, and all of this has led to higher consumer spending and lower adherence to this product.
With this, the author shows that although many defend ethanol as a solution to lower fuel prices, others believe that other forms of fuel favored by nature are tested, to provide more viable and efficient options to the consumer.
You can find more information about clean fuel sources at the link:
I think t<span>hat would allow a group to be responsible for the protection of both, both being the group and the environment. And both are in need of a protection right now.</span>
