1- The correct answer is B.
The narrator could not believe what Miguel had said, so he run off to the park to investigate. When he arrived, he realized Miguel was correct: there were no traces of the carnival there: no holes where the spikes had been, no hay scattered about.
2- The correct answer is D.
The narrator's father was astonished because he believed that Miguel and the reporter were wrong. He could not understand how it could be possible for there to be no carnival in the area when he and everyone in town had been to one the night before.
Since our method of communication wasn't very reliable, I couldn't get enough details. So if you see any mistakes, I apologize. I've tried to fit the criteria you've described, and I hope it works for you.
Answer:
A good or bad propaganda can be defined by what it aims at achieving and the methods used to achieve this.
Propaganda are usually carried out with the aim of influencing people's feelings and their actions. It can have good effects and bad effects.
A good propaganda is used to influence attitude and actions positively. Like in a scenario where the media is used to warn about the dangers of a new disease. A good propaganda appeals to the people logically as well as emotionally.
A bad propaganda is one that achieves it's purpose by driving conflict and controversy deliberately. It is used to bring change deceitfully in a democratic setting.
