With now days Modern tech. it impacts us greatly considering for example houses, back then their would be leaks and all, now we have houses that are water resisting, or like the new electric cars saving fossil fuels
A political motive for the Alien and Sedition Acts was to protect the rather new and fragile nation by limiting the expression of free speech in newspapers and other media that spoke ill of the government.
Answer:
Your answer is absolutely correct
Explanation:
Your answers are correct, because from the given options, the bills of attainder are options A and C.
This is because, the KKK and Communists are being declared guilty of a crime without trial and arejot allowed to participate in politics.
A bill of attainder is an act of the law that states that a person or group is guilty of a crime and metes out punishments, most times without finding them guilty by a complement court of law.
Answer:
<u>Because even if the Absolutism has similarities and was applied in almost the entire Europe, each country modeled its conceptions to adapt to reality. </u>And this reality could be <u>social, political or religious.</u>
Explanation:
I believe that the better way to understand this point is analyzing the two major countries where the Absolutism was strong: France and England.
- France was ruled by Louis XIV in the 17th century. He describes himself as "The state is me" (“L'Etat c'est Moi”). This monarch is the main definition of the absolutist ruler. <u>To support his government, Louis XIV follows the idea of Divine Right of Kings which argued that the monarch had divine powers and was elected by God. Thus, his actions and laws were divine and couldn't be disrespected. </u>The question is: why this conception worked in France? <u>Because it was a catholic country, and religious perceptions were followed without question. Plus, Louis XIV had no limits in his powers. I mean, there was no law or political scheme that could limit him.</u>
- On the contrary, in England, <u>the king was subjected to the Parlament. </u>However, only this restriction was not sufficed to limit his power. The main point is that the British kings <u>followed the idea of a social contract (popularized by the philosopher Thomas Hobbes). </u>This idea attests that <u>a king has duties with its people,</u> and the Parlament was always remembering him about this. So, he couldn't do whatever he wanted.
