I'll attempt to answer this one! Agriculture gave people the chance to grow crops of all kinds depending on their materials or resources. Agriculture was pretty easy for anyone to learn and maintain for themselves. Agriculture led to an abundance because seeds were easy to acquire from the crops to grow more and many people were able to grow their own crops. In terms of pastoralism, people could also raise livestock. They could derive meat from the animals and food sources such as milk from animals like cows or goats. The livestock were pretty easy to maintain as many of them only needed to eat grass to produce/grow well.
Are you talking about Joseph Raymond McCarthy?
Answer:
A. Until about 1750, core areas of Europe India and China enjoyed similar levels of economic development
Explanation:
The notion that European culture is inherently more developed reflects and old ethnocentric belief that has been probed several times to be wrong.
Europeans lacked much of the development and borrowed it from other regions of the world.
For example, Chinese inventions (paper, print, silk) already formed part of the culture in Asia and India also showed important advances in science and technology.
The notion of Europeans being racially or naturally superior to other peoples has historically been a myth.
Until around 1750, both <em>India and China had a quality of life similar to Europeans and perhaps together they surpassed it already in our present time. </em>
Became the Byzantine empire which lived on from around 500 AD to 1446 AD
