1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ASHA 777 [7]
3 years ago
10

In your opinion, do you believe the

History
1 answer:
tekilochka [14]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

No, the Crusades weren’t justifiable. The Arab/Muslim conquest of the region centuries earlier wasn’t justifiable either. There were no good guys or bad guys in that conflict. Both sides were wrong.

From the perspective of Jews and Samaritans, it was really just two colonial powers (Crusaders and Arabs) fighting over a land that never rightfully belonged to either of them in the first place.

Explanation:

What is important today is to understand that the unjustified reaction of the Christian community to actions in the Holy Land can be compared to the reaction of people in the Muslim world to Western dominance. So, instead of something like the Crusades was seen as an acceptance by many Muslims of terrorism. If the Christian Crusades were bad, so is the Muslim acceptance for decades of terrorism, particularly towards Israeli civilians.

You might be interested in
Between 1910 and 1930, over 1.6 million african americans left the south and migrated to northern cities to find work. how did t
svet-max [94.6K]
In the north racism was different as in they wasn't getting hung 
6 0
4 years ago
Why did Hernán Cortés commit treason by renouncing his allegiance to Diego Velázquez, the Spanish governor of Cuba?
mariarad [96]

Answer:

Hernan Cortes was the Spanish conquistador who conquered the Aztec Empire in Mexico between 1519 and 1521.

Due to several adversities, Cortes did not come to the New World until 1506. He took part in the conquest of the islands of Hispaniola and Cuba and received large lands and Native American slaves for his efforts.  

Cortes eagerly sold and pledged all his land to buy ships and supplies. He arranged through Cuba's governor Diego Velazquez, a distant relative, as well as his father-in-law, that he should lead an expedition. Officially, the goal was to discover and trade with the new countries it was rumored to be westward. He was forbidden to colonize, but through his persuasive ability and legal knowledge he had previously obtained, succeeded in persuading Governor Velazquez to insert an additional clause. It would allow him to take the necessary action without authorization, "for the good of the kingdom". At the last minute, the governor felt that Cortes was too ambitious for his own good, and changed and deleted the clause. Basically, the expedition was a private adventure as it had been funded by Cortes' own and borrowed funds.

With only 700 men, he succeeded in conquering the Aztecs' kingdom against all odds. When Cortes arrived in Mexico in 1519, the Aztecs waited for their god Quetzalcoatl to return and overthrow the Aztecs. When Cortes appeared, it was believed that a god had come. The Aztecs terrorized their neighbors by occasionally attacking them to take prisoners, which were used at religious ceremonies (with cannibalistic elements). Therefore, there was a great dissatisfaction among the Native American tribes around the Aztecs. Therefore, many of these stood on the Spanish side.

3 0
4 years ago
What was NOT a warning in Washington’s farewell address?
marysya [2.9K]

Answer:

A - do not give the people too much power.

6 0
3 years ago
What descriptions are true about a civilization?
Art [367]

C. a civilization is a large amount of people in your town and you all are very close.

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was a major difference between the Massachusetts Bay Colony and Rhode Island?
liraira [26]

B. Rhode Island practiced religious toleration while Massachusetts Bay Colony did not.

Roger Williams (1603-1683) firmly believed in freedom of conscience. He founded the Rhode Island colony after being banished from Massachusetts in 1636 because of his views. He advocated keeping church and state separate. Rhode Island became a safe place for various religious dissenters and minorities to find a place to exist peacefully -- Baptists, Quakers, Jews and other religious minorities. Years later, when colonial America became the United States of America and the US Constitution was being written, Roger Williams idea of maintaining a “wall of separation” between church and state influenced the framers of the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Freedom of religion was not the case in the Massachusetts Bay Colony, dominated by Puritan law. The Puritans came to America so they could practice their religion, but did not allow freedom for others within their colony. Those who did not follow the Puritan ways were often sent away (as Roger Williams was).

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did islam influence the government of the ottman empire?
    5·2 answers
  • Action taken by first continental congress
    5·1 answer
  • Which is not true of the pyramids? they contain the pharaoh s most valued possessions. they were embellished with interior fresc
    12·1 answer
  • Why would you redistribute wealth?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following would be an example of limited government
    6·2 answers
  • Which consequence resulted from nationalism throughout the 20th century?
    5·2 answers
  • 3 How do the governor's
    6·2 answers
  • Items manufactured by the Egyptians included:
    9·1 answer
  • How did Italian and German unification differ?
    5·2 answers
  • About how many geographic circuits does the United States have?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!