1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lianna [129]
3 years ago
11

Andrew Jackson's plans to remove American Indians from rhe southeastern United States created conflict because: A. The supreme c

ourt ruled that American Indian ribes should be considered independent nations. B. The five civilized tribes wanted to be in charge of removal policies.
History
1 answer:
8_murik_8 [283]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A

Explanation:

The supreme court argued that the Indian Tribes should be considered Independent nations.

You might be interested in
Southern "dixiecrats" left the democratic party because:
lawyer [7]
The Dixiecrats were southern Democrats who left the party in 1948 because of their objection to extending civil rights to African-Americans.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Match each historical figure with the corresponding information.
MAVERICK [17]
I don't really know what the question is
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
During colonial times outside of New England, education was 
riadik2000 [5.3K]
A
Particularly in the southern colonies, education tended to be reserved for the gentry and upper-class people (plantation owners mainly). Slaves were not educated; in fact, it was illegal to teach slaves to read or write. This stemmed from the fact that a large portion of education involved the Bible, slaves who read the Bible could be expected to convert to Christianity, and Christians are forbidden to enslave one another by their religion. Significant social and economic inequality persisted in the South well into the 20th century. 
4 0
3 years ago
During his confirmation hearing, Chief Justice John Roberts stated that Roe v. Wade (1973) "is the settled law of the land." Thi
goldfiish [28.3K]

Answer: Reliance on legal precedent

Explanation:

Reliance on legal precedent should be a key factor in court's ruling since if stakeholders cant's success on mediating their reliance on precedent forfeit, then any claim they'do therefore, it'll be taken under stare decisis doctrine. This comes from a judicial theory that states: when a pronouncement has built enough reliance, then a presumption against adjudicative change must follow.

7 0
3 years ago
What was the Counter-Reformation?
pochemuha
The answer is B) A series of actions by the Catholic Church intended to spread and defend the Catholic faith.

The counter-reformation was in response to the Protestant reformation, so the first answer is out of the question.
Martin Luthers own actions sparked the Protestant reformation, and as mentioned prior - it was a response to the Protestant reformation (however, during this time they did solidify the power of the pope).
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • An explanation of how Ancient Greek pottery was unearthed in India please help me asap
    6·1 answer
  • Under the English Westminster model, the highest court of appeals is
    6·1 answer
  • Why was finding new trades important to European leaders and early explorers?
    12·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP!!!!! I NEED AN ANSWER!! HURRY!!
    5·1 answer
  • How are changes of state important in how a refrigerator works?
    7·1 answer
  • Percent of land used for farming in japan
    11·1 answer
  • What was the name of our first national constitution?
    6·2 answers
  • The creation of the Democratic Party is most associated with..?
    8·1 answer
  • What does the term abolition refer to?
    8·1 answer
  • How does the “Lost Colony” demonstrate the difficulty in establishing a new colony?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!