Easy cases are almost always resolved correctly by lower courts. If there doesn't appear to be a possibility of the lower court having made an error, the Supreme Court will decline to hear the case. Also, the Supreme Court has far too little time to hear every case sent to it, so it will tend to turn down cases that don't deal with important and difficult Constitutional issues.
success of growing wheat in the dry hillsides
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
They were often launched in the hopes of finding alternative sailing routes to Asia
Explanation:
Portugal was not the only country interested in the emerging lands of the northwest Atlantic. Both England and France were concerned to stake their claims as well, disputing the right of the Pope to divide the world between Spain and Portugal.
Like the Portuguese, they were interested in establishing the geography of the region, and were especially interested to find out whether a viable westerly route to Asia actually existed. This was the primary reason for those English voyages which took place after Cabot. By contrast, the French were as interested in the potential of the fisheries, and the other resources which the region had to offer and also trying to find an alternative route to Asia.
Answer:
Judicial review allows the Supreme Court to take an active role in ensuring that the other branches of government abide by the constitution. ... Rather, the power to declare laws unconstitutional has been deemed an implied power, derived from Article III and Article VI of the U.S. Constitution
Explanation:
French soldiers helped to reinforce the continental army at the final battle of Yorktown in 1781
