1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nimfa-mama [501]
2 years ago
12

List the results of the Indians not accepting the Treaty of Paris 1783

History
1 answer:
Elan Coil [88]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The Treaty of Paris was signed by U.S. and British Representatives on September 3, 1783, ending the War of the American Revolution. Based on a1782 preliminary treaty, the agreement recognized U.S. independence and granted the U.S. significant western territory.

You might be interested in
1.What personality characteristics did Jackson display during the Petticoat Affair
Sphinxa [80]

The correct answers to these open questions are the following.

Although the are no options provided, we can say the following.

1) What personality characteristics did Jackson display during the Petticoat Affair?

President Andrew Jackson was very upset and angry during the Affair because he felt he had been the victim of a conspiracy. He thought that his enemies used the Petticoat Affair to damage him, while Jackson believed that this was just a social incident. He said that the issue was taking out of context and proportion.

2) Who was able to vote in the United States prior to Jackson’s presidency?

Prior to Andrew Jackson's presidency, white men with no property were able to vote in the United States elections.

5 0
3 years ago
Which term explains that an authority has to prove to a court why it is holding someone? If the government cannot show why a per
Bogdan [553]

Answer:

A) Habeas Corpus

Explanation:

Habeas Corpus is a legal action or writ that demands that a person under arrest be brought to judgement in a court of law, to secure his release, unless there are legal reasons which justify their detention.

In many instances, the law enforcement authorities may arrest citizens and detain them for a long time without charging them. The Habeas Corpus prohibits this kind of incidence and abuse of power.

The court hears the case brought forward by the prosecution and decides whether there is a lawful basis for detaining a person. Based on the evidence the court finds, the Judge may grant the inmate release from prison or a reduction in sentence.

6 0
3 years ago
Hurry plz paragraph<br> should the federal goverment have more power than the state goverment.
Travka [436]

Answer:

Yes , Any dispute about which is more powerful -- the federal government or the states -- was settled in 1789 when the Constitution granted the federal government the right to collect taxes, regulate interstate commerce, raise an army and adjudicate legal disputes between states.States, or alliances of states, have attempted to nullify federal power, but the federal government has eventually prevailed, although in the case of Southern slavery, it took a four-year war for the federal government to do so. Beyond that, states have served as pockets of resistance or innovation, attempting to weaken federal laws, or to advance new legislation that the federal government is not yet ready to consider.  

Explanation:

Hope this helps

8 0
4 years ago
European traders wanted protection from:
horsena [70]
I believe the answer would be number one because pirates were a big deal back then
5 0
3 years ago
Explain the movement towards social equality after the Revolution
nika2105 [10]

Answer:

revolutionary movement (or revolutionary social movement) is a specific type of social movement dedicated to carrying out a revolution. Charles Tilly defines it as "a social movement advancing exclusive competing claims to control of the state, or some segment of it".[1] Jeff Goodwin and James M. Jasper define it more simply (and consistently with other works[2][need quotation to verify]) as "a social movement that seeks, as minimum, to overthrow the government or state".[3]

A social movement may want to make various reforms and to gain some control of the state, but as long as they do not aim for an exclusive control, its members are not revolutionary.[4] Social movements may become more radical and revolutionary, or vice versa - revolutionary movements can scale down their demands and agree to share powers with others, becoming a run-of-the-mill political party.[4]

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement best describes the streams on either side of the Great Divide?
    10·2 answers
  • Which of these is a natural monopoly? Cell phone service Computer repair Package delivery service Sewage treatment
    11·2 answers
  • In the years before world war l, tensions grew among European countries as they competed for land and power in
    8·1 answer
  • Was the military doctor a awe
    11·1 answer
  • 2. What three factors led to revolution?
    7·2 answers
  • PLS HELPPPP!
    6·1 answer
  • What effect did Federalist No. 51 have on the final U.S. Constitution?
    9·1 answer
  • Problems associated (connected with) rapid urbanization included..
    14·1 answer
  • How was the American Revolution a direct cause of the Constitutional Convention of 1878
    10·1 answer
  • Which country made tanks lighter and added a rotating turret for the machine gunner?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!