Answer:
the course of history
Explanation: hope this will help :)
The primary difference between these two wars was that in the French and Indian War the colonists (who weren't that concerned with territory) were fighting alongside the British, while during the Revolution they were fighting against the British.
I would say no because if we look at economics, it is REALLY expensive to maintain a large country (this case empire) because there would simply be too many people to manage for one governing body (so I would presume a governing body and not a dictatorship). Is an "American Empire" the face of globalization? No.
Answer:
The answer is: Europeans saw territories as an extension of a home country, so they demanded that native people conform.
Explanation:
The colonization of the "Native Americans" by the European people brought confusion to the Indians. Some Native Americans saw the Europeans as friendly while others saw them as violent. There was a <em>cross-cultural difference. </em>
From the period of<em> 1601-1776</em>, the Europeans were very much eager to take control of North America,<u> culturally and economically.</u> Whenever they colonize territories, they think of the territory as an extension of their country. With this, they think that the native people must conform or adjust every time. For example, they wanted them to accept Christianity as a religion.
Coupled with America's<em> "policy of assimilation,</em>" the culture of the natives were shaped into the European-American culture.
Thus, this explains the answer.
