1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
myrzilka [38]
2 years ago
6

What was the biggest struggle for the delegates in creating a new, better form of government?

History
1 answer:
lions [1.4K]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

A central issue at the Convention was whether the federal government or the states would have more power. Many delegates believed that the federal government should be able to overrule state laws, but others feared that a strong federal government would oppress their citizens.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why did the Industrial Revolution in the United States get started in New England?
Oksana_A [137]

Answer:

I dont know sorry

Explanation:

sorryyyyyy

4 0
2 years ago
Help please!!!!!!!!!
Alex
False................
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which civilization had a cyclical view of history?
emmasim [6.3K]
"Greeks" is the one civilization among the following choices given in the question that had a cyclical view of history. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option. It was during the time of the roman Empire that this kind of <span>cyclical view of history can be detected. I hope it helps you.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following states or regions had the most significant religious tension/conflict?
Sladkaya [172]

Answer:

C. Mughal Empire - Hindu vs Muslim

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Explain what gave other Europeans the courage to begin fighting against their own oppressive leaders.
yan [13]
This chapter, which analyses the theories of cultural action which develop from antidialogical and dialogical matrices, will make frequent reference to points presented in the previous chapters, either to expand these points or to clarify new affirmations.

I shall start by reaffirming that humankind, as beings of the praxis, differ from animals, which are beings of pure activity. Animals do not consider the world; they are immersed in it. In contrast, human beings emerge from the world, objectify it, and in so doing can understand it and transform it with their labor.

Animals, which do not labor, live in a setting which they cannot transcend. Hence, each animal species lives in the context appropriate to it, and these contexts, while open to humans, cannot communicate among themselves.

But human activity consists of action and reflection: it is praxis; it is transformation of the world. And as praxis, it requires theory to illuminate it. Human activity is theory and practice; it is reflection and action. It cannot, as I stressed in chapter 2, be reduced to either verbalism or activism.

Lenin's famous statement: "Without a revolutionary theory there can be no revolutionary movement"1 means that a revolution is achieved with neither verbalism nor adtivism, but rather with praxis, that is, with reflection and action directed at the structures to be transformed. The revolutionary effort to transform these structures radically cannot designate its leaders as its thinkers and the oppressed as mere doers.

If true commitment to the people, involving the transformation of the reality by which they are oppressed, requires a theory of transforming action, this theory cannot fail to assign the people a fundamental role in the transformation process. The leaders cannot treat the oppressed as mere activists to be denied the opportunity of reflection and allowed merely the illusion of acting, whereas in fact they would continue to be manipulated—and in this case by the presumed foes of manipulation.

The leaders do bear the responsibility for coordination and, at times, direction—but leaders who deny praxis to the oppressed thereby invalidate their own praxis. By imposing their word on others, they falsify that word and establish a contradiction between their methods and their objectives. If they are truly committed to liberation, their action and reflection cannot proceed without the action and reflection of others.

Revolutionary praxis must stand opposed to the praxis of the dominant elites, for they are by nature antithetical. Revolutionary praxis cannot tolerate an absurd dichotomy in which the praxis of the people is merely that of following the leaders decisions—a dichotomy reflecting the prescriptive methods of the dominant elites. Revolutionary praxis is a unity, and the leaders cannot treat the oppressed as their possession.

Manipulation, sloganizing, "depositing," regimentation, and prescription cannot be components of revolutionary praxis, precisely because they are components of the praxis of domination. In order to dominate, the dominator has no choice but to deny true praxis to the people, deny them the right to say their own word and think their own thoughts. He and she cannot act dialogically; for to do so would mean either that they had relinquished their power to dominate and joined the cause of the oppressed, or had lost that power through miscalculation.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Prehistory can be described as _____.
    8·2 answers
  • In her book the feminine mystique betty freidanwrote about what
    11·1 answer
  • What caused the end of the reign of Czar Nicolas 2
    5·1 answer
  • Which colony was the first to want to abolish slavery?
    15·2 answers
  • which robber baron became one of the wealthiest people in the world by creating a trust that controlled most of the oil refineri
    7·1 answer
  • Write four to five sentences on how the Meiji Restoration affected the Japanese politically, socially, and economically.
    13·1 answer
  • Please help please asap
    14·1 answer
  • How did Machiavelli’s idea of a good ruler differ from that of medieval philosophers?
    6·1 answer
  • Did The Missouri Compromise let<br> territories decide the issue of<br> slavery.
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following was an American weakness during the Revolutionary War? A) Americans were not used to wilderness warfare.
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!