Knowing what to say, the good talker also knows what not to say; knowing the time to speak, he also knows the time to listen. Wh
en he feels that this time has come, it is clear that he must make a better listener than the man . . who may at any moment be seized with a lawless desire to talk himself. Do you agree with Dickens about what it means to be a good talker and a good listener ? Why or why not? Based on the excerpt , would Dickens consider the second man a good listener ? Be sure to support your answer with details and quotations from the text .
Based on the question above, Dickens did not consider the second man as a good listener.
<h3>Synopsis</h3>
From the text, he has clearly defined a good listener.
<h3 /><h3>Goodlistener</h3>
Knowing what to listen to, the good listener also knows what not to listen to; knowing the time to listen, he also knows the time to talk. When he feels that this time has come, it is clear that he must make a better talk.
<h3>Good talker</h3>
I also agree with Dickens on who a good talker or listener should be. A good talker knows the maxims of communication and so does a listener.
In conclusion, we can conclude that the correct answer is No. He would not consider him to be a good listener.
