The available options are:
A. Arrival time differs by more than 3 minutes
B. Aircraft is issued an approach other than the tower specified
C. Verbal coordination has not been yet accomplished
Answer:
Aircraft is issued an approach other than the tower specified
Explanation:
Considering the situation described in the question, and according to Instrument Flight Rules (IFR), Approach Clearance Procedures, when at Greenwood Air Traffic Control Tower (ACTC), arrival information need not be forwarded while Flight Data Input-Output (FDIO) operational unless the sequence of aircraft changes and the "Aircraft is issued an approach other than the tower specified."
For Andrea to format the legend on her chart, she needs to click on the chart to select it. The Chart Tools option appears when a chart is selected. Andrea can build charts easily and successfully using the Chart Tool in Microsoft Excel or any other Spreadsheet programme. Let us assume that Andrea is using Microsoft Excel to create her chart. When she opens Excel and looks at the ribbon band on top of the new spreadsheet, there is an option to create charts. Using this option, she can create as many charts as she needs to
Answer:
int half(int x){
int a=x/2;
return a;
}
Explanation:
function <em>half(x)</em> which has return type <em>integer</em> and accept an <em>integer </em>type parameter <em>'x'</em> and return the an <em>integer </em>value in variable <em>'a' </em>which is closest to <em>half</em> that of the parameter '<em>x'</em>.
Answer:Technology law scholars have recently started to consider the theories of affordance and technological mediation, imported from the fields of psychology, human-computer interaction (HCI), and science and technology studies (STS). These theories have been used both as a means of explaining how the law has developed, and more recently in attempts to cast the law per se as an affordance. This exploratory paper summarises the two theories, before considering these applications from a critical perspective, noting certain deficiencies with respect to potential normative application and definitional clarity, respectively. It then posits that in applying them in the legal context we should seek to retain the relational user-artefact structure around which they were originally conceived, with the law cast as the user of the artefact, from which it seeks certain features or outcomes. This approach is effective for three reasons. Firstly, it acknowledges the power imbalance between law and architecture, where the former is manifestly subject to the decisions, made by designers, which mediate and transform the substance of the legal norms they instantiate in technological artefacts. Secondly, from an analytical perspective, it can help avoid some of the conceptual and definitional problems evident in the nascent legal literature on affordance. Lastly, approaching designers on their own terms can foster better critical evaluation of their activities during the design process, potentially leading to more effective ‘compliance by design’ where the course of the law’s mediation by technological artefacts can be better anticipated and guided by legislators, regulators, and legal practitioners.
Keywords
Affordance, technological mediation, postphenomenology, legal theory, compliance by design, legal design
No, you would see arrows pointing in opposite directions <--> like so
