Why was ending all trade with Britain and Ireland in the First Continental Congress a good thing?

2 answers:

7 0

Answer: What inference can you draw from why the First Continental Congress cut off trade with Britain and Ireland? Colonial leaders thought a boycott against British trade would be effective. The colonists had realized that they might have to fight British soldiers.

Explanation: Hope it helps :)

GalinKa [24]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Accomplishments. The primary accomplishment of the First Continental Congress was a compact among the colonies to boycott British goods beginning on December 1, 1774, unless parliament should rescind the Intolerable Acts. Although the Continental Congress did not function well in a time of peace, it had helped steer the nation through one of its worst crises, declared its independence and helped to win a war to secure that independence.

You might be interested in

imagine you are a historian studying a journal written by a citizen living in east berlin when the Berlin Wall was being constru

wolverine [178]

To begin with, a journal is a problematic source of information because it is usually the impressions of the person who writes it, and therefore they are very subjective. In the case raised, the journal is even more problematic because it is written by a citien of East Berlin in a period marked by political ideology.

To check if it is a reliable source, I would begin by trying to find out as much information as possible about the person who writes it to get an idea of his or her personal and ideological background since it will set the tone of the narration: ideology, in which area of East Berlin he or she lived, where he or she worked.

Secondly, I would look for other contrasted sources that mention this journal to know if it has already been taken into account and studied or if it has been discredited.

Then, in order to contrast the information present in the journal, I would look for specific places, dates and events reported by the writer and compare them to newspapers, periodical reports from that time or other bibliographical sources (public libraries or databases) to assess the author's rigour.

In no case would I study the journal as an isolated source without comparing it to others to interpret the information available.

3 0

2 years ago

What was one economic difference between the Middle and New England colonies?

Naddik [55]

Middle was poor and had more farmers and workers

8 0

1 year ago

In what ways were the movements for independence in India and Indochina<br> similar?

Burka [1]

The people of India and Indochina sought independence from their European colonial overlords in the middle of the 20th century due to nationalist feelings.

What is nationalism?

Promoting the interests of a specific nation is the concept of nationalism. A movement for independence is frequently sparked by a deep sense of national pride.

Gandhi convinced the Indian National Congress to engage in nonviolent protests by forbidding the purchase of British products and defying taxation. Indian nationalists numbered in the millions. India was awarded independence by the UK.

Hence, the significance of the nationalism is aforementioned.

Learn more about on nationalism, here:

brainly.com/question/1018147

#SPJ1

5 0

1 year ago

Why do you think president lincoln offered amnesty to most southerners but he did not offer it to former confederate officials o

Elis [28]

<span>he did not offer it to former confederate officials or military officers because those officials and officers could start a rebellion </span><span />

3 0

2 years ago

What is one difference between Philip II and Elizabeth I

Svet_ta [14]

One is a queen one a king

6 0

2 years ago