Since, options are not given, the question is incomplete. The complete question is as follows:
Which supreme court procedure involves justices discussing a case, debating its key issues, and arriving at their own opinions on the appropriate ruling?
a. deliberation
b. judicial review
c. sharing opinions
d. public arguments
Answer: b. judicial review
Explanation:
Judicial review can be defined as the power of the court to examine the case in the court of law and actions of the executive, administration and legislature of the country. The judicial review can be given a judge of court or jury. The judge of the Supreme Court is expected to give fair opinion. The jury of supreme court can discuss about a case.
This is just a guess, sorry if it's wrong but I think it's B
Answer:
The best explanation for this phenomenon is <u>PRIMING</u>
Explanation:
Primingcould be defined as a technique in which the introduction of one stimulus influences how people respond to a subsequent stimulus. Priming works by activating an association or representation in memory just before another stimulus or task is introduced.
Priming is the process by which perception or experience of an item (or person or event) leads to an increase in its accessibility and the accessibility of related material and behaviors. therefore priming is what happens when exposure to some thing influences the behavior of an individual later on, without that individual being aware that the first thing is guiding their behavior to a certain extent.
The person was exposed to a scary movie which latter affected his behaviour when he witnessed an argument which he probably think will end in a fight.
ᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟ
<span>ᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟ</span>
