Answer:
Based on the 95% confidence interval for the difference in population proportion, there is convincing statistical evidence that he is correct
Step-by-step explanation:
The proportion from the sample of people from his party that support the law = 70%
The number the members of the politicians political party that support the law = 550 people
The proportion from the sample of people from the other party that support the law = 65%
The number the members of the politicians political party that support the law = 420 people
The confidence level of the test = 95%
The given confidence interval for the difference in proportion, C.I. = (-0.010, 0.110)
Given that the 95% confidence interval for the difference in population proportion ranges from -0.010, to 0.110, it is 95% certain that 0 is among the likely difference in proportion between the two populations and therefore, there is sufficient statistical evidence to suggest that there is no difference in the proportion of the members of either political that support the proposed new traffic law.
Answer:
Your answer for F will be 13.
Step-by-step explanation:
Take 11.2 and add it to 1.8, and you will get 13 and 13 will be the variable (f). So, f (13) - 1.8 = 11.2
Hope this helps! :D
Answer:
-21.6
Step-by-step explanation:
-5.4
x 4 4x 4=16 so you carry the one to 5x4= 20 + 1 that was carried
-------- keep it negative
-21.6
No, because (2,0) is a coordinate. x=2 and y=0. So just plug in the numbers where there's x or y with the appropriate number, (2 or 0). So in the first equation, x-2y=0, when you pug in the numbers, 2-2(0)=0, you know it's wrong because 2-0=0 isn't correct. So no. the point (2,0) is not a solution to the first equation. Now plug in the numbers for the second coordinate. You get 2(2)-3(0)=1. So 4-0=1. This is once again false no no. (2,0) satisfies neither equations.