Even though the first passage isn't completely logical, since its arguments are basically hypotheses, the second passage appeals mostly to the emotion of the reader, therefore, the right answer is the first option:
Passage 1 uses a logical approach, while passage 2 contains appeals to emotion.
Answer:
A). The writer uses empirical evidence by including specific data about student debt and loans.
B). The writer uses empirical evidence by stating the exact amount of debt that his daughter owes.
F). The writer uses anecdotal evidence by sharing a personal connection to the student debt problem.
Explanation:
The authors employ a variety of evidences to substantiate their claim in order to establish their credibility and validity of their claim. In the given passage, the author primarily employs 'anecdotal and empirical evidences' to authenticate their claim.
'Empirical evidence' is illustrated as the evidence that are produced or generated by the researchers through necessary experimentation and observation(here the father recognizes the amount of money his daughter owes i.e. $50,000 and inclusion of particular data regarding student debts and loans). While the 'Anecdotal evidence' is described as the evidence molded in the form of a story that involves decisive reliability on personal testimonies(here the father presents his personal affiliation to wider issue of student debt). Thus, <u>options A, B, and F</u> are correct.
Answer:
Doubt or diffidence
Explanation:
Its the opposite of the word!
I hope this helps! :D
I would take notes just for historical reasons if that makes sense, and you can also go back and reminisce, or remember something you learned on your travels
