Uhh a good daughter I guess :/
Congress was completely ineffective in preventing the Civil War because the Southern states still seceded. This option is best drawn because of the fact that that in the case of the 2nd option, they did not delay the war in any way. It was only a matter of time until the war happened, and nothing could have stopped it from happening. Once the Southern states made the decision to secede, the war was inevitable.
Answer:
<h3>Representatives will be unable to support the rights of the people effectively.</h3>
Explanation:
- Legislative immunity provides senators and representatives the right to speak and state their opinions in the Congress without any fear of arbitrary arrest or defamation.
- This is done not to ensure the interest of the speaker but to protect the voice of the people which the speaker is representing.
- In a democracy the voice of the people is taken into account without fail. Therefore, the need to protect the representatives to speak or state their opinions in the Congress on behalf of the people becomes mandatory.
- If the provision of legislative immunity is not allowed, the essence of democratic process to represent and support the rights of the people would be ineffective.
Answer:
The expansion of democratic participation in the United States between 1824 and 1840 is often referred to Jacksonian Democracy. President from 1829 to 1837, Andrew Jackson championed the cause of "ordinary" (i.e., white and not upper-class) men. (Women did not vote until 1920.)
Explanation:
hope this helps State-based representational conflicts, however, coexisted with regionally-based conflicts. In fact, the struggle to reconcile the place of slavery in the new republic had more influence on the enumeration of federal tax authority in the Constitution than any other issue. The perplexing approach adopted with respect to direct taxation attested to slavery's impact.
Article I, Section 2 provided that "representatives and direct taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole number of free persons . . . and excluding Indians not taxed, three-fifths of all other persons." Similarly, Article I, Section 9 stated that "no capitation or other direct tax shall be laid, unless in proportion to the census or enumeration herinbefore directed to be taken." The insertion of the direct tax clauses was not designed to protect the taxing power of states against the Federal government, or that of richer against poorer states. The delegates sought this compromise, rather, as a means to account for slaves when determining the number of southern congressional representatives. goodluck
