1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BigorU [14]
2 years ago
15

How is the omicron variant different from previous variants of the novel

History
1 answer:
Drupady [299]2 years ago
3 0

The Omicron Variant is different from previous variants in some ways such as:

  • Impact on Society.
  • Impact on Individuals.

<h3>Impact on Society </h3>

The omicron variant is more contagious than previous variants which means that there will be more hospitalizations and therefore a heavier burden on the medical sector.

It is however less deadly which means that lower death rates will be seen.

<h3>Impact on Individuals </h3>

As the variant is more contagious, more people will have to be quarantined which would rob them of their time.

There will however be less death so the impact on individuals will be less severe.

In conclusion, the omicron variant will be less deadly.

Find out more on Coronavirus at brainly.com/question/24294254.

You might be interested in
Was the united state correct 1945 when it became the first nation to use atomic weapons against japan to end world war 2 or was
Dominik [7]

Answer:

It was a morally wrong decision to drop the atomic bombs.

Explanation:

This is a heavily debated opinion-based question where you can go both ways. In my personal opinion, I personally argue that it was morally wrong for the US to use atomic weapons on Japan. Below is my reasoning.

1. Japan had already expressed the desire to surrender previous to the dropping of the atomic bombs, meaning that they were not a military necessity.

Prior to the dropping of the atomic bombs, Japan had already expressed the desire to surrender under the single condition that their emperor would not be harmed. (This was mainly due to cultural reasons that made the emperor a particularly important figure) Instead of accepting, the United States instead decided to fight for unconditional surrender. While they did achieve that in the end, they ended up not harming the emperor anyway, meaning that they could have just accepted Japan's surrender in my personal opinion. Moreover, this desire disproves the argument that the decision to drop the bomb was a military necessity and many contribute Japan's surrender more so to the Soviet invasion of Manchuria which meant Japan now had to fight a two-front war.

2. Atomic weapons are a form of indiscriminite killing.

Atomic weapons don't have eyes. They can't tell the difference between the military and civilians. Thousands of women and children were killed that had no involvement in the war. It is a war crime to intentionally target civilians, so why would atomic weapons be ethically acceptable? While the US did drop leaflets to warn civilians prior to the attacks, this act is not enough, and it cannot be expected for millions to flee thier homes.

3. The government may have been considering diplomatic reasons rather than solely ending the war.

If the US was really after a speedy end to the end of the war, there could have been many other ways to go about it. They could have continued to firebomb cities or accept conditional surrender. Some have argued that the diplomatic effects that came with it such as scaring the Soviets and proving US dominance were also in policymakers' minds. If the US had not been victorious in World War II, several important members of the government would have likely been tried as war criminals.

The Counter Argument:

Of course, there is also a qualified opposing view when it comes to this. It is perfectly valid to argue that the bomb was necessary for ending the war: as it is impossible to know the "what ifs" had history not happened the way it did. It is undeniable that the atomic bomb likely saved thousands of American lives if the war would have continued, and the war did ultimately come to an end a couple of days after the atomic bombs. There also is not enough evidence as to what exactly was the reason the Japanese unconditionally surrendered: it could have been Manchuria or the atomic bomb, both, or even other reasons entirely. Lastly, the general public did approve of the bombings at the time.

In recent years, the public have slowly become more critical of the bombings, although it remains a weighted moral debate.

Note: These are my personal views and this does explicitly represent the views of anyone else. Please let me know if you have any questions :)

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who the last king of Aksum <br>​
jeka94

The Aksumite Empire ended with the last King, Dil Na’od who was defeated by his former General Mara Takla Haymanot who founded the Agaw Zagwe dynasty. According to legend, a son of Dil Na’od fled in exile, until his descendants overthrew the Zagwe dynastic rulers and re-established the Solomonic dynasty around AD 1270.

7 0
2 years ago
Which company paid the largest criminal fine in history?
laiz [17]

Answer: Pfizer received the largest criminal fine in history.

Explanation:  the company had to pay a criminal fine of $1.195 billion and its subsidiary Pharmacia & Upjohn Company

3 0
3 years ago
Why did JFK not have a mandate for his proposal
Sloan [31]

Answer: Because a conservative coalition of Republicans and Southern Democrats blocked many of Kennedy's measures

Explanation: John Fitzgerald Kennedy often referred to by his initials JFK, was an American politician who served as the 35th president of the United States from January 1961 until his assassination in November 1963. He served at the height of the Cold War, and the majority of his work as president concerned relations with the Soviet Union and Cuba.

In terms of domestic legislation however, Kennedy's record was less successful, as Congress repeatedly blocked his policy proposals. Some of the reform proposals Kennedy made that were rejected by a conservative Congress include,

medical care for the aged; rebuilding of blighted urban areas as well as federal aid for education.

6 0
3 years ago
How native american groups used different forms of agriculture to sustain societal growth?
Sati [7]

Answer:

They used different forms of agriculture, to make other tribes of Native Americans interested to barter with them.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the study of nature change during the 1500s and the 1600s?
    10·2 answers
  • Im being timed
    14·1 answer
  • Difference between a president and a prime minister in iraq
    12·1 answer
  • Why were the colonists angered at the king's response to the Olive Branch Petition? (3 points)
    5·1 answer
  • What does it mean to make connections in a group discussion? Check all that apply. to relate speakers’ comments to one another
    7·1 answer
  • In his “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” how did Martin Luther King describe the purpose of nonviolent direct action?
    6·2 answers
  • Which type of job declined dramatically in the United States in the late twentieth century?
    15·2 answers
  • CAUSE AND EFFECT. PLEASE HELP!!
    14·1 answer
  • Alexander Hamilton's long-term goal was to: Group of answer choices make the United States a major commercial and military power
    10·1 answer
  • Civil War era medicine was able to deal with most injuries.<br> True or False?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!