Well, it depends on all on the sources. Web sites such as .org can be a reliable source. Some things that are usually reported, have an evidence and a claim to support what the article, and it should have a publisher and date at the bottom of the page. some common things to look for are headlines, a picture of proof, publisher, and the source^_^
Answer:
Either would be good depending on context.
Explanation:
Ok, for this one I think that you could use either, depending on your context. if you are writing something from the perspective of when she was on the supreme court then you can use the first one. but if it is from the perspective of her legacy, or of an opinion she has right now about when she was a supreme court justice it might be best.
Hope this helps!
~B
Can you mark me brainliest here :D
To raise a good dog, patience is useful.
Being a first-year student, my professors do not accept Wikipedia as a credible source of information.
Some animals, such as male frogs, only use their vocal organs to attract a mate.
Looking around the aisle of my local drugstore, I was amazed by the varieties of cosmetics that are available today.
toward her credit card balance
Answer:
-It was created as a response to Great Britain overtaxing the colonists, so the founding fathers decided to send a declaration to King George declaring that America would be free, and that was the cause of the American Revolution.
Explanation:
This is actually the Declaration of Independence. I don't know what declaration your talking about but if this is right, your welcome.