Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
The answer is feudalism. This was a mix of lawful
and armed customs in feudal Europe that succeeded between the 9th and 15th
centuries. Approximately defined, it was a method of constructing society everywhere
relationships resulting from the allotment of land in exchange for service or work.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
korea bombed pearl harbor making the U.S. angry
The plague came along during the Hundred Years' War between England and France, both of whose governments were staggering under the expense of maintaining the lengthy conflict. Revenues from taxation, the chief source of funding the war, came almost to a standstill, particularly in France. Another unexpected result of the number of deaths was that there was a shortage of politicians. In England, the number required for a quorum in the City Council was halved by decree, just to keep the government going. There was so much property left owner-less after all the plague deaths, the government had to appoint special judges and commissions to decide the cases of survivors fighting over it.
