Answer:
The Holy Roman Empire encompasses less territory than the Roman Empire. After the fall of the Roman Empire, the empire was divided into the west (Byzantine empire) and east. More warfare ensued and eventually the Holy Roman Empire was established, but this time it mostly consisted of what the Roman Empire used to call savages (Germanic/Franks people) so basically the area that is today Germany, France etc. The Holy Roman Empire never conquered the entire Italian peninsula of today, which the Roman Empire did.
Explanation:
Warfare, overextension, corruption of the Roman Empire lead to its downfall and the Roman Empire was never established to its great success.
Ruben - Biomedical Sciences Major
Hi,
Jay's Treaty was unpopular because it really didn't resolve anything between America and Britain.
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "Dirty war was considered and used by the Argentine Military Government during when the nation is under the period of terrorism, around from 1974 to 1983. T<span>he end of the dirty war affected military rule in argentina</span>
Indigenous peoples made significant social progress, experienced a reduction in poverty levels in several countries and gained improved access to basic services during the boom of the first decade of the century, but they did not benefit to the same extent as the rest of Latin Americans, according to a new World Bank study. The study notes that thanks to a combination of economic growth and good social policies, poverty of indigenous households decreased in countries like Peru, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile and Ecuador, while in others, such as Ecuador, Mexico and Nicaragua, the educational gap that for decades excluded indigenous children was closed. However, the report points out that, despite these gains, many gaps remain, as indigenous peoples continue to be confronted with glass ceilings and structural barriers that limit their full social and economic inclusion. While indigenous peoples make up 8 percent of the population in the region, they represent approximately 14 percent of the poor and 17 percent of the extremely poor in Latin America. Also, they still face challenges to gain access to basic services and the adoption of new technologies, a key aspect of increasingly globalized societies.
Answer:
Rhetorical analysis has seen a sort of revival in recent decades, after a long period of disuse. From the times of ancient Greece until the beginning of the modern era, rhetoric was considered a major tool for creating effective and esthetically appealing discourse. With the advent of modern thinking, however, rationality and a scientific definition of the ideas of "truth" and "empirical proof" displaced the idea of a constructed argumentation. It has only been since scientific truths themselves have been "relative-ized", at first through notions like "paradigms," and later through the introduction of concepts and tools such as "deconstruction" that analysts have again begun to consider the importance of a discipline related to the formal construction of argumentative techniques. But the revival is not exactly a new event. About 50 years have passed since PERELMAN and OLBRECHTS-TYTECA first published their "Traité de l'argumentation" (The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation). If rhetoric was ignored for so long it was because it became associated with manuals for florid but empty discourse, partly because modern belief in scientific discourse could not be placed in doubt. "Rhetoric" was defined as insincere, and pompous bombast. At the present time, however, rhetoric is seen in another light. It has become a tool for studies in philosophy, law, linguistics, literature, and in relation to mass communication and political practices. (1988) have been particularly eloquent with regard to the use of rhetoric for psychological, sociological, and political analysis
Explanation:
