Answer:d
Explanation:
The stressing or emphasizing syllables print over a writing a kind.of mark for the rhythm to put emotion and ideas and give it a dimensionality beyond the simple meaning of a word.
The US Army Corps of Engineers, they became responsible for protecting US waters with the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
Answer:
The correct answer is The speaker in the former knows exactly what her goal is, while the speaker in the latter believes that she has already achieved it.
Explanation:
In the poem <em>Because I could not stop for Death</em> the goal of the speaker is totally clear.
What she wants is for death to lead her to eternity.
The problem is that she realizes that death was not really her faithful friend who would take her to eternity, but that it took her to what would now be her new home: her new grave, <em>“A Swelling of the Ground."</em> which leads the speaker to realize the coldness and cruelty that death has.
While in the poem <em>"Some keep the Sabbath going to Church"</em> we can see how the speaker is really happy with his goal, which is to spend his church day at home. <u>She prefers to hear the birds sing rather than hear a sermon. </u>She does not need to hear how she has to get to heaven, because for her she has already arrived. And <u>she sees it in the nature that surrounds it, and in the tranquility of her home while doing the things she likes.
</u>
Let's remember that<em> Emily Dickinson</em> was one of the greatest poetesses in history, and was characterized by her peculiar way of writing since her subjects were extravagant: she always talked about death and immortality.
Answer:
To Diana George, poverty is represented by non-profit organizations such Habitat for Humanity in a way of despair, or something that can be easily seen or recognized. Or in the case of this organization and many others, it tries as to find an surfire way to make others empathise with poverty. The problems George identifies as a result of this tactic is that poverty is not always easily recognized, and on even questions that “If it doesn’t look like poverty, then how do we adress it?” (p. 450) The largest, most pressing issue is that seeing poverty in one way instead limits our understanding on how to deal with poverty.
At the very beginning of the article, George creates an anecdote of how she encounters charities. It details her going through her mail and looking over many other poverty organization’s mail. This shows their tactic, of presenting poverty as grim and ragged, while a quote from bell hooks before that states that seeing poverty in one way challenges how people look and deal with it. Providing these two largely contrasting viewpoints, in a way, makes them appeal to different audiences by expressing both her issue and a counterclaim to structure the remainder of textual analysis.
The purpose of George’s textual analysis is to ultimately show that representing poverty as weak and depraving only hinders the fight against it instead of resolving it. Everyday, it’s a question of who is poor and who is not, but that itself is becoming increasingly difficult to tell. This rudimentary mindset eventually leads George to state that “There are certainly many cultural and political reasons for these problems…but I would suggest that the way the way poverty countinues to be represented in this country and on tapes limits our understanding.” So if people continue to see poverty in this sight, the ones that are poor but still have a home or job will challenge this belief. People will not know how to deal with them, and this essentially why George criticizes non-profit organizations such as Health for Habitat
