1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]
3 years ago
9

HEEEEELP 2O POINTSS

History
1 answer:
liberstina [14]3 years ago
4 0
G,false because society’s cultural and more values
You might be interested in
Where were the Nazca lines created?
Ronch [10]

Answer:

Nazca Lines. The Nazca Lines /ˈnæzkɑː/ are a group of very large geoglyphs formed by depressions or shallow incisions made in the soil of the Nazca Desert in southern Peru. They were created between 500 BCE and 500 CE.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The SALT I agreement in 1972 brought about
fiasKO [112]

Answer:

The SALT I agreement in 1972 brought about the regulation of Soviet production of missiles that carried nuclear weapons. ... SALT I was the reason behind the creation of Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty.

Explanation:

hope that helps, have a nice day!

7 0
3 years ago
John lewis what significant events has he walked in or experienced?
olchik [2.2K]
Lewis and Clark expedition
4 0
3 years ago
The early Bantu’s agricultural practices distinguished them from other cultural groups of this era because the Bantu
krok68 [10]
The early Bantu’s agricultural practices distinguished them from other cultural groups of this era because the Bantu….

Answer: The reason why the Bantu’s agricultural practices distinguished them from other cultural groups was because the Bantu established complex social systems. Women farmed, men mostly tended cattle. Cattle food source and ritual sacrifices. Status in Bantu societies determined by size of cattle herds. Also thanks to their acquired knowledge of agriculture and ironworking they established themselves as a dominant group.

I hope it helps, Regards.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What connection does that Bible story and Dylan's song have with ethics and the so-called "Divine Command Theory" as espoused by
Darina [25.2K]

The connection is that Dylan's song ("Highway 61 Revisited") and "that Bible story" (Abraham sacrificing Isaac) both point to the ethical idea that doing the right thing means doing whatever it is that is divinely commanded.  

Explanation/context:

The origins of "Divine Command Theory" stem back to a dialogue written by Plato, which has the philosopher Socrates engaged in discussion with Euthyphro about the meaning of piety or goodness.  Socrates was being accused of impiety in Athenian court.  Impiety to the Athenians meant conduct that was displeasing to the gods.  At that same time, Euthyphro was at court in Athens to prosecute his own father for having killed a servant.  Socrates asked the kinds of questions he normally did, pressing Euthyphro how he knew that prosecuting his own father was a good thing.  Euthyphro said punishing wrongdoers for wrongdoing was the pious thing to do, no matter who the wrongdoers are.  Socrates then asked Euthyphro to how we know what "piety" is -- and Euthyphro said it was doing that which is dear to the gods.  That's the "divine command" theory in a nutshell.  Bear in mind, as the dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro continued, there was much more nuanced thought about how well that definition works.  Socrates asked, for instance, "whether the pious or holy is beloved by the gods because it is holy, or holy because it is beloved of the gods."  That became a difficult conundrum for their consideration in the dialogue.

The Abraham story in the Bible follows the "divine command theory" idea. When God commanded Abraham to sacrifice his only son Isaac, the fact that God commanded it would make it right, according to divine command theory -- even though the act itself seemed horribly wrong.

Bob Dylan played with that idea in the lyrics to his song, "Highway 61 Revisited," from the album <em>Highway 61 Revisited </em>(1965) ...

<em>Oh, God said to Abraham, "Kill me a son"</em>

<em>Abe said, "Man, you must be puttin' me on"</em>

God said, "No" Abe say, "What?"

God say, "You can do what you want, Abe, but

The next time you see me comin', you better run"

Well, Abe said, "Where d'you want this killin' done?"

God said, "Out on Highway 61"

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How was racism evident even in the Abolitionist movement, and what steps did some Abolitionists take to fight racism in American
    11·1 answer
  • What issue was standing the way of the U.S. to gaining the territory in the Northwest?
    12·1 answer
  • Why were kamikazes so frightening?
    13·2 answers
  • What nation did the Syria, Jordan, and Egypt fight in the Six Day War in 1967?
    14·1 answer
  • Democracy is seen as a waste of time; it's weak
    6·1 answer
  • Why was the presidential election of 1800 so historic
    15·1 answer
  • How long did it take billy to save the money for his dogs?
    7·1 answer
  • 22) How did Cyrus the Great rule is Empire? What did he do when he took over a new kingdom?
    9·2 answers
  • Anyone know the order these go in??
    6·1 answer
  • What did the "M" stand for that was branded
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!