The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "Most likely, the reason for an increase in the price of a specific stock because of the demand of that specific stock, and the other thing is that the price of that stock in the world market is expensive to buy."
Explanation:
By this we expect that share prices increase because of stock and demand. If more people need to buy a stock (demand) than sell it (supply), then the value goes up. Conversely, if more people required to sell a stock than buy it, there would be the higher amount than a market, and the price would befall.
There was opposition to the Revenue Act of 1763, on a basis that no one in Parliament could have foreseen.
<span>The Revenue Act, which came to be called the Sugar Act, was actually an extension of an act from 1733 called the Molasses Act. The Molasses Act required a tariff on all sugar products that were imported into America from the West Indies. The American colonists, however, had found that it was not difficult to smuggle their sugar items into the colonies and avoid the tariff that was due to the British government. This sort of activity was not allowed to go on in any other part of the British Empire, and Lord Grenville saw no reason why it should be permitted in the colonies and be winked at by England.</span>
Farmers who moved to the city thought they would have a better life there. Most of the time, they had very little land, not enough to guarantee their survival. Two or three bad harvests ruined them. They had to ask for money to the landlord in order to keep working, but if they didn't have enough to pay them when the harvest came they would have to leave the land to pay their debt. With no place left to go, they moved to the city lured by promises of a better life that turned out to be false.
Answer:by a group of senators which were from the ides of March
Explanation:
Hope I helped
I think it's b himalayas. Hope this helps
