The law of good continuation allows him to perceive the students walking in each direction on the sidewalk as separate units.
<h3>What is the
law of good continuation?</h3>
The law of good continuation states that figures with edges that are smooth are more likely seen as continuous than edges that have abrupt or sharp angles.
In conclusion, the law of good continuation allows him to perceive the students walking in each direction on the sidewalk as separate units.
Read more about good continuation
<em>brainly.com/question/5303325</em>
Answer:
along the banks of the Niger River
Explanation:
Because if there is river or ocean there is a source of food and water.
Answer:
Brundtland Report
Explanation:
The Brundtland Report, published in 1987 by the United States Nation .
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
