Answer and Explanation:
You should ask these questions before making a judgment about the findings that raising livestock is harmful to the environment and that the sale of meat should be banned:
<em>1. How many studies have shown the same results?</em>
This is an important question to ask since results from one researcher or (group of researcher) need to be tested for reliability and validity before it is accepted as scientific truth or fact. This is why you should check if other studies also show the same result about the harmful effects of raising livestock on the environment.
<em>2. Does the group conducting the study have anything to gain by interpreting their findings in this way?</em>
Unfortunately, at times, certain researchers or groups of researchers fabricate or exaggerate their research findings for their own gains or to further their agendas. In this instance, since the group conducting the research is the <em>Ethical Treatment for Animals</em> it is possible that the group interpreted and published the research findings to fit their own paradigm- that eating meat is unethical and should be stopped- when in fact such a claim needs further testing.
<em>3. Does the environmental damage matter as much as people's freedom to eat what they choose?</em>
This is a valid question to consider as it involves the matter of free will. Banning the sale of meat would take away the free will of individuals who would like to continue consuming meat despite evidence suggesting that it is harmful for the environment. Thus, it is important the consider whether environmental damage matters as much as people's freedom to eat what they choose when making a judgement about these research findings.
Can you include some more details?
Not entirely sure what you mean by this unless you mean specific interpretations of the constitution, which is considered judicial review which was established in Marbury v Madison, also known as an informal amendment.
Europe, has more advances in technology in warfare, transportations. Also their governments are strong and stable due to ones careful rule.
But the real reason for European dominant is because they really and I mean really focus on their militaristic aspect as which they relied on for stability, conquest, and glory because thousands of years, Kings and some Queens are tought the ways of war and how war can give more than just territory and as a matter of fact Kings had trained themselves in Europe for milania, so not just did Kings evolve but the technology to fight among themselves were drastically improved as well.
I hope I was a little help to you
