I don't understand your question.
Polydectes tricked Perseus into believing that he was furious for not bringing a gift for his wedding so Perseus said that he would give anything he wants. Upon hearing it, he then asked for Medusa's head, a cursed woman guarded with a lot of snakes in her head that whoever stares at them turns into stone. He asks for Medusa's head because he know it was suicidal mission.<span>
</span>
Answer:
The miller takes his son’s place on the donkey’s back.
Explanation:
If the miller didn’t worry about people’s opinions he would not have had them switch places due to a strangers opinion.
The intolerance of witchcraft had caused a 19 people to be
executed and a few more were locked down in prison cells. This infamous hysteria started when people
were acculturated with Puritan superstitions. Puritans were said to believe the
existence of demons and evil spirits and their corresponding good counterparts.
This belief had created a perception that misfortunes are connected to them and
thus fuel the superstition even more.
The correct answer to which detail in the excerpt best supports the author's opinion that Kalhat is a secure city is "The Malik of Hormuz fears no one when he is in Kalhat".
The author states that <em>an important person </em>like the Malik of Hormuz goes to Kalhat whenever he is<em> "at war with neighbors more powerful than himself"</em> because the city<em> "is strongly built and situated"</em>, thus, <em>he feels entirely protected from enemies and fears no one.</em> By doing that, <em>the author supports his opinion that Kalhat is a secure city, after all, an important and influent character trusts in its safety.</em> So, the correct answer is to which detail in the excerpt best supports the author's opinion about Kalhat's security is " "The Malik of Hormuz fears no one when he is in Kalhat".
The correct answer couldn't be <em>"Ships from India frequent the port in Kalhat"</em> because that <em>doesn't imply, without a context, that the city is safe. </em>That statement could even, if inserted in a <em>different context</em>, imply that due to the frequency of ships in Kalhat it could be considered dangerous. It's not the case, because that author drives the reader into understanding that the port is safe and protected. Still, <em>this sentence alone doesn't support the author's opinion about the fact that the city is secure.</em> Therefore, the correct answer couldn't be "Ships from India frequent the port in Kalhat".
The correct answer couldn't be <em>"A large number of war horses are shipped from Kalhat"</em> because, although this statement <em>might convey that the city is disposed of many war horses and that could mean strong military activity</em>, it <em>doesn't relate</em> this fact with Kalhat's security. So, this answer doesn't support the author's opinion that Kalhat is a secure city.
The correct answer couldn't be <em>"Spices and other goods are sold in Kalhat"</em> because this detail doesn't relate to Kalhat's security, it is <em>much more an observation about the city's commerce</em>. Hence, this answer doesn't support the author's opinion about the city's security.
