Answer:
Colonialism in North Africa, because of its violence and the huge transformations it caused within its societies, shaped a historical vision of the North African past that obscured other, far more deeply rooted processes. This paper not only aims to emphasize the impact of these other, deeper historical processes, it also suggests that by taking in to account this longue durée, our analytical frameworks would be expanded and so too would our understanding of Maghreb history in general and its colonial history in particular. The first section of the paper analyzes the outlines of colonial history; it examines the limitations of the spatial framework and the timeline markers used within this field of research. The second section examines the new vistas of research opened through serious consideration of the legacy and persistent effects of early modern history in North Africa. It explores these new perspectives in terms of time and space and interpretations of North African primary sources.
Explanation:
Conflict broke out because of unification issues.
Explanation:
The effects of the French and Indian War for all parties involved were huge. The British Empire, having won the war, had a heavy expansion of British Territory Claim in the New World. However, it did leave them in massive debt. As for the French, having lost, they also were banished from the New World. They handed their claimed territory all over to the British Empire, along with Canada also. They did manage to save a few islands though. Lastly, the Native Americans were given the bad end of the stick. The tribes that had been at aid for the French were cut off from their supplies and forced the tribes to compel to the new laws of the British Empire.
