Answer:
Every person should be free from want.
Every person should be free from fear
Every person should have freedom of speech and expression.
Explanation:
Four freedoms were goals expressed by US president on 6th Jan, 1941 in four freedoms speech. Four Freedom Speech was the the 1941 State of the Union address. In the speech he proposed that people around the world must have four fundamental freedoms, The freedom of speech, Worship, freedom from want and fear.
This speech was delivered 11 months before the Pearl Harbour attack. The speech was about the national security of US and the threat that the democracies around the world faced from the word wars. F.D. R talked about the role of US in helping allies instead of following the policy of non-interventionism.
Interpretations differ because they are written for different audiences. Historians select information and when they write they can distort information to make their arguments stronger. Historians change their views when they discover new evidence.
So go with evidence answer
Here are some different arguments you could make for this question:
1) Equal legal rights for African-Americans- The Civil Rights movement and the responding laws, like the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, were two huge steps forward in making America the "more perfect union" it is today. This is because a country is supposed to be a collection of people that are able to have equal rights in the eyes of the law.
2) Women's rights- The Women's rights movements of the early 20th century and 1960s-1970's resulted in women getting the right to vote and gaining legal rights they never had before. This helped towards reaching a more perfect union because it allowed for men and women to have the same legal rights.
Answer:
Harry S. Truman made the decision, and the Enola Gay
(a B-29 Bomber Aircraft) dropped the bomb.
2)they also recommended the bomb be dropped to maybe try and stop the war
Explanation:
1)"It was their recommendation that the bomb be used against the enemy as soon as it could be done. They recommended that it should be used without specific warning and against a target that would clearly show its devastating strength."
2)"We can propose no technical demonstration likely to bring an end to the war; we see no acceptable alternative to direct military use." It was their conclusion that no technical demonstration they might propose, such as over a deserted island, would be likely to bring the war to an end. It had to be used against an enemy target. …