<h3>In the given scenario unemployment rate is 10%
</h3>
Explanation:
In the given problem,
Number of People who are working is 90,000
Number of People who are not working but looking and available is 10,000
Unemployment rate = Percentage of the total labor force that is unemployed but actively looking for employment and ready to work.
Unemployment rate = ((Unemployed people * 100) / (Total people in an economy (Working + Available for work)))
Unemployment rate = ((10000 * 100) / (90000+10000))
Unemployment rate = (1000000 / 100000)
Hence, Unemployment rate = 10%
Answer:
$2,385,086
Explanation:
To answer this question, we need to use the present value of an ordinary annuity formula:
Where:
- A = Value of the annuity
- i = interest rate
- n = number of compounding periods
Because the interest rate is annual, it is convenient to convert it to a monthly rate.
4.5% annual rate = 0.37% monthly rate.
The number of compounding periods will be = 12 months x 30 years
= 360 months
Now, we simply plug the amounts into the formula:
You will need to have saved $2,385,086 if you plan to retire under the aforementioned circumstances.
The answer choice that correctly describes the impact of the supplies purchase on the financial statements is A. total assets will remain unchanged.
<h3>What is an Asset? </h3>
This refers to financial property owned by a company or individual that has some degree of value.
Hence, we can see that given the fact that a company purchased supplies for cash that would be used in a few months, this would leave the total assets unchanged.
Read more about assets here:
brainly.com/question/11209470
#SPJ11
Answer: likely to be well-founded since CEO compensation at many U.S. companies has actually increased even when the company performed poorly
Explanation:
The options to the question are:
A. unfounded, since laws in the United States prevent firms from paying large salaries or bonuses to executives when a firm reports a loss.
B. based on an erroneous conclusion, because CEO pay is always based on a formula tied to the company's profits and losses.
C.likely to be well-founded since CEO compensation at many U.S. companies has actually increased even when the company performed poorly.
D. not entirely unfounded, but he needs to realize that the pay received by most chief executives must be reinvested in the company if it's unprofitable for three years in a row.
From the question, we are informed that Paulo owns a few shares of stock in a large and diversified firm na that he noticed that the CEO of the company is responsible for a multi-billion dollar business, but is upset with what he feels is excessive compensation for the CEO particularly since the firm has reported losses for the past two years.
Paulo's concerns are likely to be well-founded since CEO compensation at many U.S. companies has actually increased even when the company performed poorly.
