Answer:
Many more innocent people have been killed by paroled or released murderers than have been wrongly executed.
Explanation:
Remember that to refute an argument means to disprove it by using your logic and reasoning in an argument, it is a reply. In this case my opponent is against capital punishement and gives me the arguments that support the idea. It´s argument states that the capital punishment is a "state-sanctioned killing and can kill innocent people."
To refute this I need to address to the topics presented. The option chosen is the one that does this, it makes a comparison of the numbers of deaths resulted from each type of outcome. In my opponent´s argument innocent people sentenced to death could eventually die. In my argument I state that although this has happened, the number is very small. In fact, the criminals that are released have killed more innocent people. This is a way to compare the pros and cons, in which my argument presents way more benefits that the cons presented by my opponent.
Answer:
Can you send an image of the question?
Answer:
unknown
Explanation:
There's no options here to choose from, but a passive voice would sound something like: "A civilian was hit by driver on the street."
The receiver of the action at the beginning of the sentence, action done in the middle, and doer of action at the end.
Answer: memo consists of two parts: the identifying information at the top, and the message itself. At the top, identify for whom the memo has been written, who is sending it, the subject, and the date. The subject line serves as the memo's title.
Explanation:
