I believe the answer is A. With universal meaning diverse. Hope that helps feel free to ask me questions if you don’t understand. :)
So I totally just got this from this website this is not my answer but I found it:
Quick Answer
Hamlet hesitates to kill Claudius because he believes that Claudius is praying. If he were to be killed right after praying, when his soul is at its most pure, Claudius would go directly to heaven—and Hamlet wants to be sure he sends him to hell. But Hamlet can't hear what Claudius is actually saying; Claudius admits that he cannot fully repent of his murder of King Hamlet, because doing so would mean giving up his crown. So, technically, Claudius's soul is not pure, and Hamlet could have killed him in this moment, but Hamlet doesn't know this!
Detailed Answers:
Hamlet doesn't kill Claudius at this point because he believes that Claudius is praying. He says that killing the king NOW would be "hire and salary, not revenge!" He simply cannot send Claudius to heaven, where he would surely go were he killed just after praying and purging his sins. He thinks that would not avenge his father's murder, because Claudius killed Old <u>Hamlet</u> without giving him the opportunity to pray, and therefore, Old Hamlet must spend time in hell. Hamlet thinks killing Claudius when he is fit for heaven would be like paying Claudius for the murder of his father. That simply would not do.
The real irony is that Hamlet does not realize that his revenge could have been complete if he had actually killed the king then and there, because Claudius was not really praying. Oh, sure, he was on his knees, but Claudius says that he knows he cannot be forgiven for the murder unless he truly repents, and repentance would mean giving up his crown and queen. So when Claudius says "My words fly up, my thoughts remain below./ Words without thoughts never to heaven go," he is really admitting that he knows he isn't forgiven. If only Hamlet had known, then Polonius, Ophelia, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, Leartes, Gertrude and Hamlet all could have survived.
This is the website: https://www.enotes.com/homework-help/end-act-3-scene-3-why-didnt-hamlet-kill-claudius-2709
1. B. The great white.
(It’s just a description of the shark)
2. B. Ampullae of Lorenzini
(It talks about fish located by electro sense, but more it’s more specifically called Ampullae of Lorenzini)
3. B. Several hunting techniques
(It explains different hunting techniques for hunting animals like seals and dolphins.)
4. C Worlds sub-arctic coastal waters.
(It explains the habitat, where sharks live, which is waters off the coast, but specifically sub-arctic.)
5. D It’s a hacksaw.
(It’s not the past tense of see, we are talking about sharp teeth, which could be referred to like a hacksaw)
6. D Such bites do little damage to buoys and other objects.
(It doesn’t state explicitly that the shark does tear the victim apart, it doesn’t describe the shaking motion, and if never says it swallows its teeth.)
7. D. To enable the sharks to detect the electromagnetic fields.
(The pores are used for Ampullae of Lorenzini, which help the shark detect and hunt prey.)
