Answer:
D) the self-serving bias.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it seems that his example illustrates a self-serving bias. This term refers to an individuals characteristic of attributing positive events to themselves but at the same time placing negative events as caused by external factors. Which is what Ainslie is doing by blaming other factors when she did bad on her test but when she got an A- she attributed that to her own talent.
If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
conditioned response
Explanation:
conditioned response is voluntary response which is developed by training anybody to respond in a particular way if he is facing a particular stimulus.
It is part of study of classical conditioning in which one is trained to behave in certain way if a particular thing happens/event to him. by method of repetition and training to behave in specific way in a specific situation. Now if he faces that situation normally , he behaves in trained way even though he is forced to behave so. This response is conditioned response.
Here, Taye was trained to salivate to bell. Hence when he heard bell, he salivated and thus showed conditioned response.
If Ken does not account for variables such as age that could also influence one's ability to recall these events, age could be considered a "confounding variable".
A confounding variable is an outside impact that progressions the impact of a dependent and independent variable. This incidental impact is utilized to impact the result of a experimental plan. Basically, a confounding variable is an additional variable went into the condition that was not represented. confounding variables can demolish an examination and deliver futile outcomes. They propose that there are connections when there truly are definitely not.
Answer: The correct answer is : Cristopher Simmons was sentenced to death when he was 17 in 1993. Several appeals were made until 2002 but all were rejected, in this year the Supreme Court of Missouri suspended the execution of Simmons. The United States Supreme Court ruled that executing the mentally handicapped violated the prohibitions of the eighth and fourteenth amendments. Because of this in Missouri it was decided to reconsider the Simmons case. The Missouri court invalidated the decision taken in 1989 in the Stanford v. Kentucky as it claimed that the execution of minors was not unconstitutional and it was concluded that it was cruel and unusual.
