1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Andreas93 [3]
3 years ago
5

Lucille signed a living will when she was 65 years old and in good health. It stated that she wanted no extraordinary medical pr

ocedures to be used if doctors determined she would not recover. She was conscious of the ramifications of her decision. At the age of 85 she had a stroke in her brain stem and could no longer breathe for herself or take in food. Doctors determined that she would not recover respiration or digestion.
Required:
What would be true in Lucille's case?
Health
1 answer:
Anna [14]3 years ago
7 0

People who are old often needs extra care. The true statement about Lucille's case is that could be given sedatives and pain medications but should not be put on a ventilator or given a feeding tube.

It is very important to understand what kind of healthcare should be given to old people.

  • It is not always easy when asked to take/make a health care decisions concerning a person that is dying and is unable able to make his or her own decisions.

An approaches that is used is make decision by putting yourself into the shows of that person who is dying and try to choose as he or she would have done.

See full question below

Lucille signed a living will when she was 65 years old and in good health. It stated that she wanted no extraordinary medical procedures to be used if doctors determined she would not recover. She was conscious of the ramifications of her decision. At the age of 85 she had a stroke in her brain stem and could no longer breathe for herself or take in food. Doctors determined that she would not recover respiration or digestion. Which of the following would be true in Lucille's case?

Lucille could be given sedatives and pain medications but should not be put on a ventilator or given a feeding tube.

Providing nutrients to Lucille through a feeding tube would be permissible.

Connecting Lucille to a ventilator to help with respiration would be permissible.

Lucille's children could override the living will because it was drawn up 20 years before the stroke occurred.

Learn more from

brainly.com/question/1774997

You might be interested in
A response that, after conditioning, follows a previously neutral stimulus is called the
Tpy6a [65]
Classical conditioning
8 0
3 years ago
True or false <br> Women should usually have a higher body fat percentage than men
tekilochka [14]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Women tend to store fat in their breasts and butt which means they do have a higher body fat percentage.

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is NOT a common barrier to getting proper exercise?
musickatia [10]
B. health problems!
hope that helps!
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why does alcohol remain legal
marta [7]

Answer:

Too Many People Drink

Advocates of marijuana legalization often point to a 2015 Pew Research report that indicated that almost half of all Americans — 49 percent — had tried marijuana. That's roughly the same as the number of Americans age 12 or older who report that they currently drink alcohol. Realistically speaking and in either case, how can you outlaw something that roughly half the population does on a regular basis?  

The Alcohol Industry Is Powerful

The Distilled Spirits Council of the United States reports that the alcoholic beverage industry contributed more than $400 billion to the U.S. economy in 2010. It employed more than 3.9 million people. That's a lot of economic muscle. Making alcohol illegal would strike a significant financial blow to the U.S. economy.  

Alcohol Is Endorsed by the Christian Tradition

Prohibitionists have historically used religious arguments to ban alcohol, but they've had to fight the Bible to do it. Alcohol production was Jesus' first miracle according to the Gospel of John, and the ceremonial drinking of wine is central to the Eucharist, the oldest and most sacred Christian ceremony. Wine is a symbol in the Christian tradition. Outlawing alcohol would affect the religious beliefs of a good portion of American citizens who are protected by a Constitution that promises freedom of religion.  

Alcohol Has an Ancient History

Archaeological evidence suggests that the fermentation of alcoholic beverages is as old as civilization, dating all the way back to ancient China, Mesopotamia, and Egypt. There was never a time in recorded human history when alcohol wasn't part of our experience. That's a lot of tradition to try to overcome.

Alcohol Is Easy to Produce

Alcohol is pretty easy to make. Fermentation is a natural process, and banning the product of natural processes is always tricky. Jailhouse "pruno" can easily be made in cells using products available to prisoners, and much safer, tastier beverages can be made cheaply at home.

As Clarence Darrow put it in his 1924 anti-Prohibition speech:

Even the drastic Volstead Act has not prevented and cannot prevent the use of alcoholic beverages. The acreage of grapes has rapidly increased since it was passed and the price gone up with the demand. The government is afraid to interfere with the farmer's cider. The fruit grower is making money. The dandelion is now the national flower. Everyone who wants alcoholic beverages is fast learning how to make them at home.

In the old days the housewife's education was not complete unless she had learned how to brew. She lost the art because it became cheaper to buy beer. She has lost the art of making bread in the same way, for she can now buy bread at the store. But she can learn to make bread again, for she has already learned to brew. It is evident that no law can now be passed to prevent her. Even should Congress pass such a law, it would be impossible to find enough Prohibition agents to enforce it, or to get the taxes to pay them.

But the best argument in favor of keeping alcohol legal was the precedent set by the Prohibition to which Darrow referred. The Prohibition failed, repealed by the 21st Amendment in 1933.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In your opinion does a parents failure to vaccinate his or her children constitute a lack of social responsibility
CaHeK987 [17]
Just like advice wat u think I think I will different
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 14. Which is the next level of government that responds to an incident when it has the potential to expand beyond the
    14·2 answers
  • How long does it take the body to get energy from food?
    5·1 answer
  • 10 POINTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ANSWER A AND B.
    15·2 answers
  • As medical care is increasingly being provided by managed care organizations and as methods are developed to evaluate the qualit
    7·1 answer
  • What is the difference between the interaction with a close guy friend and the interaction if a guy likes you(how he acts)? Had
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following is NOT a fall prevention system?
    15·2 answers
  • Leslie is starting to plateau in her cardiovascular endurance workout program due to boredom. She decides to include biking and
    7·2 answers
  • P.E
    15·1 answer
  • “Tissues, Part 4 – Types of Connective Tissues: Crash Course A&amp;P #5”:
    15·1 answer
  • For a average 9 year old child what would the average height be?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!