I think Roger Williams received help from the native Americans.
The American colonists were justified in doing this simply because their colonies had become too big and too important to be treated as a colony by the British. The British should have given the colonies some autonomy, but they did not. The analogy I like to use is that of teens and their parents. Parents have to give teens more independence as they grow up. If they do not, the teens may justifiably rebel.
The British were not, on the whole, brutal or oppressive towards the colonists. However, they would not let the colonists have much in the way of self-rule. This had been fine when the colonies were still small and economically weak. By the 1760s and 1770s, however, the colonies were "teenagers." They were big and strong enough to expect some autonomy. When Britain reacted to requests for autonomy by being more strict, the colonists were justified in rebelling.
The answer should be A, cause and effect. The cause is pesticides and the effect is loss of bees
Well Texas vs Johnson was concerned with the protest that burned the flag of the unites states of America. Engle vs vital was about separation of religion in schools by having morning prayers in public schools. Hazelwood vs kuhlmier was concerned about students publishing whatever they wanted to in school newspapers and if the principal had the right to stop an article from being published. They all have the part about protesting one of the core beliefs in the constitution whether it is free speech or freedom of religion and our right to protest
