1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Katarina [22]
2 years ago
12

What skills does Northup possess?

History
1 answer:
HACTEHA [7]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

b

Explanation:

took test

You might be interested in
Write 4 sentences on what your definition of mindfulness is.
nexus9112 [7]

Answer:Mindfulness means maintaining a moment-by-moment awareness of our thoughts, feelings, bodily sensations, and surrounding environment, through a gentle, nurturing lens. ... When we practice mindfulness, our thoughts tune into what we're sensing in the present moment rather than rehashing the past or imagining the future.

The activity of mindfulness is from the category of meditation that allows the person to observe their environment and surrounds without thinking about the meaning or definition. It also allows the person to experience the presence without any judgement.  

This is useful in everyday life since there are a number of interactions that may be interpreted as different ways by different persons. All these different schools of thought may cause conflict to arise but it the person practices mindfulness, there may be a way to overcome these difficulties.lanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
At the Constitutional Convention, delegates from northern and southern states disagreed about:
Thepotemich [5.8K]

A. Whether the federal government should have the power to regulate slavery

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do people support the Right to Bear Arms amendment?
EleoNora [17]

Answer:

Explanation:Modern debates about the Second Amendment have focused on whether it protects a private right of individuals to keep and bear arms, or a right that can be exercised only through militia organizations like the National Guard. This question, however, was not even raised until long after the Bill of Rights was adopted.

Many in the Founding generation believed that governments are prone to use soldiers to oppress the people. English history suggested that this risk could be controlled by permitting the government to raise armies (consisting of full-time paid troops) only when needed to fight foreign adversaries. For other purposes, such as responding to sudden invasions or other emergencies, the government could rely on a militia that consisted of ordinary civilians who supplied their own weapons and received some part-time, unpaid military training.

The onset of war does not always allow time to raise and train an army, and the Revolutionary War showed that militia forces could not be relied on for national defense. The Constitutional Convention therefore decided that the federal government should have almost unfettered authority to establish peacetime standing armies and to regulate the militia.

This massive shift of power from the states to the federal government generated one of the chief objections to the proposed Constitution. Anti-Federalists argued that the proposed Constitution would take from the states their principal means of defense against federal usurpation. The Federalists responded that fears of federal oppression were overblown, in part because the American people were armed and would be almost impossible to subdue through military force.

Implicit in the debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists were two shared assumptions. First, that the proposed new Constitution gave the federal government almost total legal authority over the army and militia. Second, that the federal government should not have any authority at all to disarm the citizenry. They disagreed only about whether an armed populace could adequately deter federal oppression.

The Second Amendment conceded nothing to the Anti-Federalists’ desire to sharply curtail the military power of the federal government, which would have required substantial changes in the original Constitution. Yet the Amendment was easily accepted because of widespread agreement that the federal government should not have the power to infringe the right of the people to keep and bear arms, any more than it should have the power to abridge the freedom of speech or prohibit the free exercise of religion.

Much has changed since 1791. The traditional militia fell into desuetude, and state-based militia organizations were eventually incorporated into the federal military structure. The nation’s military establishment has become enormously more powerful than eighteenth century armies. We still hear political rhetoric about federal tyranny, but most Americans do not fear the nation’s armed forces and virtually no one thinks that an armed populace could defeat those forces in battle. Furthermore, eighteenth century civilians routinely kept at home the very same weapons they would need if called to serve in the militia, while modern soldiers are equipped with weapons that differ significantly from those generally thought appropriate for civilian uses. Civilians no longer expect to use their household weapons for militia duty, although they still keep and bear arms to defend against common criminals (as well as for hunting and other forms of recreation).

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
• Who did the Nazis begin using poisonous gas on in 1939?
Nezavi [6.7K]

Answer:

The Nazis began experimenting with poison gas for the purpose of mass murder in late 1939 with the killing of patients with mental and physical disabilities in the Euthanasia Program.

6 0
2 years ago
In what two ways did the crusades contribute to the spread of renaissance ideas throughout Europe
Elis [28]

The Crusades were initiated by the Catholic Church in order to gain control of Jerusalem again, as it has fallen into the hands of the Muslims. While the Catholic Church had its goals in conquering Jerusalem, including wealth and power, it didn't foresee that the organizing of the Crusades its going to actually backfire on it and make the biggest blow to it.

The Crusades themselves had mixed outcome, sometimes winning, sometimes losing. What had much greater effect was that the Crusaders managed to bring in Europe lot of things from Asia which turned out to change the course of the history.

Because the Crusaders were in constant contact with the Muslims, they brought in numerous technological advancement in Europe. Also, through them, some of the ancient literature from Greece and Rome came back to Europe.

This prompted a huge interest among the people, especially the ones higher in the hierarchy, as they saw the potential of the new technology, but also the potential for the future based on the ancient literature. The end result was technological boom in Europe, loss of power by the Catholic Church, the Age of Discoveries, or all put in one, the Renaissance.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following situations is an example of a civil case? (2 points)
    11·1 answer
  • I need the answer for number 9
    10·1 answer
  • What TWO groups of people colonized South America
    13·1 answer
  • Which is an example of a direct tax? gasoline tax protective tariff income tax cigarette tax
    7·2 answers
  • Mary has to fill the 15-gallon gasoline tank on her car. While she is filling the tank, she notices that it takes 15 seconds to
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP
    5·2 answers
  • Do you believe that citizens should be able to vote on the internet? Why or why not?
    12·2 answers
  • US economic influence in other countries led to __________ diffusion.
    13·2 answers
  • The writings of Transcendentalists had the greatest influence on which of the following movements?
    6·1 answer
  • Someone kown Siege of the International Legations?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!