Answer:
The answer is C I took the quiz.
Explanation:
The image shows the choices.
Answer:
c. Deductive, analogy
Explanation:
In this scenario, the argument being made would be classified as a deductive analogy. An analogy basically compares two things together in order to explain an idea, most of the time these two things have something in common that allows that idea to be better understood. In this scenario, they are comparing a rabid dog and an unexploded bomb. Since the unexploded bomb is the object that the rabid dog is being compared to it would be considered the conclusion, and since the conclusion is being applied first in the second part of the argument you are therefore using deductive logic.
Answer: Because of his i<u>nflexible</u> attitude, the King had become a <u>menace</u> to his people. Although he had ruled for 40 years by <u>mutual</u> consent of his countrymen, the King had placed himself in an <u>advantageous </u>position by mounting a large army to defend his castle, and had secured great wealth and a very large kingdom.
As the King looked down at his <u>gnarled </u>fingers, he realized that to <u>incite </u>the people with even more taxes would be foolish. At his age, and with his health failing, soon his sons and daughters would <u>inherit </u>his vast kingdom, and his more than <u>adequate</u> wealth. Why risk the chance of having opposing forces <u>descend </u>upon his castle? To <u>enhance</u> his wealth at this time could only lead to disaster.
Explanation:
Answer:
Johnny is leaving the café.
Explanation:
