Okay so I think you're asking for a question to further your argument and in that case, I would suggest maybe
“so why don't they stand up for them?”
You could then go into the idea that the same people who have these beliefs also believe that they as individuals can't do anything to help the oppressed
I hope this is helpful for you and may have even sparked ideas of your own
:)
The concept that would a reader most likely only fully understand after reading a text more than once is the names of government leaders who created a state law.
<h3>What is reading?</h3>
Reading is a process of taking in your sense something by remembering it or seeing it. Reading is good exercise for the mind.
Here the names of government leader needed to be read again and again to fully understand memorizing because they are difficult to grasp.
Thus, the correct option is 5.) the names of government leaders who created a state law.
Learn more about reading
brainly.com/question/18589163
#SPJ1
make suggestions on how cyber savvy campaigns could overcome public apathy to deal with human rights violations
In "A Worn Path", Old Phoenix Jackson was able to hit the dog her cane before falling into a ditch. She waits until a young white hunter shows up and helps her out of the ditch. He is demeaning at first about her age, then shows prejudice because he says “I know you old colored people…wouldn’t miss going to town to see Santa Claus!”
She sees a nickel has fallen out of the hunter's pocket, and before taking it, she distracts him by saying that his big black dog isn't afraid of anything. Not only does he chase it off to prove her wrong, but also points a gun at her at an attempt to assert power.
